Always look a little sketchy.
Posted on 04/12/2019 12:58:38 PM PDT by 11th_VA
Edited on 04/12/2019 3:06:43 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
DALLAS (AP)
(Excerpt) Read more at usnews.com ...
Sudden Jihad Syndrome can strike any muslim at any time.
They can start following the example of their prophet without warning.
Imho the best solution is to ban islam
Always look a little sketchy.
Azizi - such a lovely Irish name. Is there a coat of arms?
“Matin Azizi-Yarand”
Sounds like a Muslim name.
It is really too bad.
Good that the judge sentenced him to 20 years. I hope they will not let him out early.
Agreed. And when I read about a -- as the article puts it: "a suburban Dallas teenager"-- I don't think of names like Azizi-Yarand.
Guess he won’t be making any “cool clocks” any time soon.
The most obvious, cost-effective and humane solution to 9/11 would have simply been a complete travel ban with approx. 30 nations of the mid-east, North and West Africa, and South Asia. Send any resident aliens from those places packing immediately.
There would have been no $$ multi-trillion wars, no TSA, no need for porno-scans, leftist-promoted cultural strife.
duh, I think I see a trend.
/s
Yeah I’m sure the courts would support that, but only if Obama (or perhaps some other Democrat) were President.
Omar’s comments will further fuel the fire.
You better, we’re full of them.
After 9/11 GW Bush could have walled the border and fixed immigration but instead we get a new giant government bureaucracy (TSA) and a bloody, useless war in Iraq. Seems like a nice guy, but one a terrible president.
bbb…..bbbu…...bbb…..bbbut it’s ILLEGAL for teenagers to possess assault weapons. This can’t be.
That doesn’t sound like a Dallas teenager to me.
That sound like someone who is not one of us to me.
Perhaps Ilhan Omar knows this person.
When Shrub called 1,400 years of death cultism and terror the “Religion of Peace”, we were screwed.
Wonder how he’d be treated if an American kid went to some Muslim city and did the same thing?
[There would have been no $$ multi-trillion wars]
Genghis Khan, probably the greatest conquerer ever, never had a problem with guerilla warfare, even though the lands he conquered included Afghanistan. Why? Because his army simply slaughter all civilians, including their babies, who dare to fight against them.
In the Vietnam war, the Americans struggled against the Vietcongs. When China fought Vietnam, China simply romped through North Vietnam (north of Hanoi), transport removable factories/infrastructure back to China while destroying those that they cannot bring back. One crack Vietnamese division that was rushed back from Cambodia wisely decided to settle into prepared defensive positions near Hanoi instead of reinforcing the surrounded troops north of Hanoi. Why didn’t China has problem with Vietcong guerilla fighters?
When I first visited China in the 1990s, a retired veteran bitterly told me that his Major was killed by a ~6 year old Vietnamese kid holding a secret pistol when he was giving out food to the kid. Apparently, this is not an isolated incident. Very soon, they enacted Genghis Khan’s strategy. North Vietnamese villagers encountered were simply labeled as “civilian militia”, treated as combatants and showed no mercy. PLA never encounter anymore guerilla problems because there were no civilians left to provide the guerilla with information, shelter and food!
In the 1980s, there is no internet and no international reporter who has access to report on this. Chinese body counts, which included “civilian militia combatants”, concluded that enemy casualties were in excess of 10 times PLA losses.]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.