Your questions are to be answered in court beginning May 28...Until then, he should be held, but there is no reason he should be held in maximum security without any visitation rights to his family, which is the way it was until he was moved.
Seems reasonable. I have not seen any explanation for why they wanted to keep him in maximum confinement. Is there some underlying information that has not been made public, some threat that they think he poses to even his family?