“Argumentum ad lapidem is a logical fallacy.” Look in the mirror, You are striking at windmills.
I have not accepted as good or needed ANYTHING about the UN Security Council, including its resolutions, other than the one one thing alone for which it remains “useful” - it is a forum; PERIOD; that is all.
All your arguments are straw arguments, because you and I have no argument about the things for which the U.N. security council is not needed nor useful. THAT fact does not make the executive forum it provides as totally not useful - it is.
You’re presenting opinion as fact. I already cited the UNSC’s track record via one example; this is no strawman. There are already other examples in the body of the OP article, particularly Germany’s intent to push left-wing agenda items not related to actual world security and the antisemitic spirit of Resolution 2334.
The UNSC serves no use as a forum and never has, unless as a forum to push the left’s totalitarian agenda. It deserves no money from us, and ought to be disbanded and replaced with a forum that does not promote the destruction of its primary sponsor.