Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27
... weighed in on the differences between how the Robert Mueller report was handled compared with the Kenneth Starr report.

They were both handled according to the published laws and regulations in place at the time.

Kenneth Starr was appointed under the independent counsel statute -- which meant he reported to Congress, not the U.S. Justice Department.

The independent counsel statute -- which was always of dubious constitutional legitimacy anyway -- was allowed to expire in 1999. Some cynics say the whole purpose of the Starr investigation and the impeachment of Bill Clinton was to give Congress the political leverage they needed to do this.

Robert Mueller was appointed under internal DOJ rules. He operated as a DOJ official, and his reporting responsibilities lay entirely within the DOJ.

11 posted on 03/27/2019 6:58:39 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Details. Details. They don’t need no stinking details.


22 posted on 03/27/2019 7:11:17 AM PDT by VA40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

Details for anyone who wants them:

After the expiration of the Ethics in Government Act in 1999, the Office of Independent Counsel was replaced with the office of Special Counsel, defined by regulation 28 CFR 600, which in turn is based on Congressional statute 28 USC 510.


43 posted on 03/27/2019 7:43:15 AM PDT by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson