Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi: We Need Mueller Report, Not ‘An Interpretation’ by Someone Appointed
Breitbart ^ | 03/26/2019 | Ian Hanchett

Posted on 03/27/2019 6:29:07 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

While speaking to reporters on Tuesday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) called for the release of the Mueller report and stated that Attorney General William Barr “is appointed for a particular job, to make sure the president is above the law.”

Pelosi said, “Right now, the message should be clearly, let us see this report. I have great respect for Special Counsel Mueller, but let us see the report. We don’t need an interpretation by the attorney general, who is appointed for a particular job, to make sure the president is above the law. We need to see the report.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: interpretation; mueller; pelosi; report
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 03/27/2019 6:29:07 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I’d be telling her no, the security risks are too great and dims are not trustworthy. Sorry, Nan, no report for you.


2 posted on 03/27/2019 6:31:00 AM PDT by bk1000 (I stand with Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Question:

Do we know who has actually seen the report? Trump’s people, sure. But do we think the Democrats really know what is in the report? To whom was it distributed and have there been any leaks?

Because the Democrats seem really eager to show it to the American people. Is that a deliberate strategy, or a wild hope that something “good” is in it? Because I’m hoping that the report discusses bad stuff related to Obama and Clinton and that the American people eventually see that bad stuff mostly because the Democrats themselves demand it.

But if Pelosi already knows what is in it, then my hope is forelorn.


3 posted on 03/27/2019 6:33:29 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Did she ever say this about Bammy and Holder?.......... didn’t think so


4 posted on 03/27/2019 6:33:52 AM PDT by Hyman Roth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bk1000

Didn’t the AG quote directly from the Muller report? FFS, these people are looking like idiots.


5 posted on 03/27/2019 6:34:47 AM PDT by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Dems have become such pompous asses...well, I guess they always were.


6 posted on 03/27/2019 6:35:30 AM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hawkaw

Nancy isn’t even good at checkers.


7 posted on 03/27/2019 6:35:38 AM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Isn’t Nancy interfering with the independence of the Justice Department, and threatening the sanctity of separation of powers? According to Nancy, I mean. And doesn’t her public questioning amount to Obstruction of Justice, leading to her removal from office? According to Nancy, I mean.


8 posted on 03/27/2019 6:35:50 AM PDT by rightwingcrazy (;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
In good time. Her "demand" is unnecessary...and frankly stupid...just "I have Power" rhetoric.

Dems love to make stuff up. They loved Mueller when they "thought" he had something to confirm all the last two years of bullsh**.

Feels just like election night....it's not possible...she lost. Mueller's report says they lost again.

9 posted on 03/27/2019 6:37:17 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Nancy, did you appoint Mueller? No.

Did you change the Special Counsel law to include a report to Congress in addition to a report to the AG? No.

Nancy, do you know what "pound sand" means? No.

10 posted on 03/27/2019 6:38:11 AM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

After the special prosecutor role was canned congress came up with the special consul position and put some restrictions on what that role would/could make public. Now they want to change the rules. Typical politicians.


11 posted on 03/27/2019 6:39:54 AM PDT by dblshot (I am John Galt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Keep passing green energy bills, like the last one, Nancy! Eventually one or two Senators might vote for it.


12 posted on 03/27/2019 6:39:59 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Only Barr and Rosenstein, I am told. Not Trump or the general White House apparatus.


13 posted on 03/27/2019 6:40:22 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Let them see it like obummer did. I don’t remember specifically what it was, but you could only see his report or whatever one at a time, kept under lock and key and you could not take notes.
Sure, the Dems will scream and whine, but just keep repeating “that’s how obama did it!


14 posted on 03/27/2019 6:41:56 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
"We don’t need an interpretation by the attorney general, who is appointed for a particular job, to make sure the president is above the law."

Oh.....my.....God....

15 posted on 03/27/2019 6:41:57 AM PDT by ex91B10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

16 posted on 03/27/2019 6:43:40 AM PDT by eaglestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

It will be leaks of re-written material.


17 posted on 03/27/2019 6:44:11 AM PDT by Jimmy The Snake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dblshot

The Special Counsel is not a product of Congress at all. It is entirely within the internal rules of the DOJ.


18 posted on 03/27/2019 6:44:25 AM PDT by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Nancy wants to be the one to interpret the report.


19 posted on 03/27/2019 6:44:29 AM PDT by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

What a ding bat...Dems sore losers and whiners. They don’t tend to the business of the people. They make up their own rules...I have had it with them and MSM.


20 posted on 03/27/2019 6:45:51 AM PDT by OKITRUMP77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson