Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robowombat

I thought Judaism and Christianity required us to welcome foreigners?


2 posted on 03/22/2019 7:43:29 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wastoute

When they fire rockets at you and release incendiary devices in your direction, not so much.


3 posted on 03/22/2019 7:45:32 AM PDT by robowombat (Orthodox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: wastoute

“I thought Judaism and Christianity required us to welcome foreigners?” I guess you missed the part about requiring these ‘foreigners’ to obey the Law, under penalty of death. Inconvenient for you I know.


9 posted on 03/22/2019 8:05:45 AM PDT by Bayan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: wastoute

The Bible said to welcome sojourners not armed invaders. That’s why there were so many wars with the Philistines


11 posted on 03/22/2019 8:35:58 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: wastoute

Do you let people into your house who want to take it over and kill you?


12 posted on 03/22/2019 8:46:50 AM PDT by Harpotoo (Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: wastoute; RitaOK; Melian

You are under no obligation to embrace an invading army or a pack of criminals. True?

http://www.ncregister.com/blog/kschiffer/what-the-bishops-the-catechism-and-st.-thomas-aquinas-say-about-immigration

Aquinas and the Catechism: A Different Perspective

But St. Thomas Aquinas would seem to approach the issue of immigration from a different perspective. In his Summa Theologiae, Aquinas was careful to divide relationships with foreigners into two categories: peaceful, and hostile. Among peaceful relationships, he identified three types of encounter which the Jews might have with foreigners who entered their lands:

Sometimes, foreigners simply passed through their land as travelers;
Foreigners came to dwell in their land as newcomers. In Exodus 22:21 and again in Exodus 22:9, the Law protected the rights of newcomers, warning “Thou shalt not molest a stranger”; and
When any foreigner wished to be admitted entirely to their fellowship and mode of worship. In this instance, the newcomer was not to be automatically admitted to citizenship. Immigrants from some countries were not to be admitted to citizenship for two or three generations.

“The reason for this,” Aquinas wrote,

“...was that if foreigners were allowed to meddle with the affairs of a nation as soon as they settled down in its midst, many dangers might occur, since the foreigners not yet having the common good firmly at heart might attempt something hurtful to the people.”


13 posted on 03/22/2019 12:47:53 PM PDT by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: wastoute; Pete from Shawnee Mission; Melian

If thinking in terms of the broadest of ridiculous generalities is your gig, you definitely find no need to lock your own doors, and it’s a certainty you buy no insurance.


14 posted on 03/22/2019 3:31:37 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Ed & Academia are the FARM TEAM for more Marxists coming, infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson