I am a bottom line kind of a person.
To me the bottom line is this: Is there anything that the President can do that won’t be overruled by a lefty judge, usually in the Ninth Circuit.
Build the wall, don’t build the wall, what good is any of it if some judge rules that wall or no wall we must allow asylum seekers to enter with impunity? We have a problem in this country and, if nothing else, Trump has exposed it. We have a permanent government that could care the less about what the people who choose the elected government want.
The permanent government is gonna do what they gonna do and just say to you and I “screw you.”
As for new or old wall, it doesn’t matter if the old wall sucks. The old walls were usually built at the areas that needed them the most. If they want to start by upgrading there, I am for it.
I suspect they have their worms in journalism just as the US press.
“To me the bottom line is this: Is there anything that the President can do that won’t be overruled by a lefty judge, usually in the Ninth Circuit.”
What do the courts have to do with national security? The only way PDJT can be ‘overruled’ is if he lets himself be overruled.