DOJ Deal With FBI on Clinton Foundation——In one of the most explosive parts of Strzok’s testimony, he revealed that the Department of Justice struck a deal with the FBI not to investigate the Clinton Foundation emails.
Then-majority general counsel Zachary Somers asked Strzok if the “the Clinton Foundation was on the server.” Strzok said he believed that it was “on one of the servers, if not the others.” However, he noted that there was an agreement between the DOJ and Hillary Clinton that the FBI was not allowed to search Clinton Foundation emails for that information.
Several sources have told SaraACarter.com that there is an ongoing FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation. One of the FBI field offices believed to be part of the ongoing investigation is in Little Rock, Arkansas, the former home of President Bill Clinton and his wife.
“Were you given access to those emails as part of the investigation,” Somer’s asks Strzok. “We were not. We did not have access,” Strzok said. He said the FBI eventually was granted access to the Clinton’s server, but only after negotiating with Clinton’s attorneys.
The FBI “had it voluntarily in the context — in the case of the servers, voluntarily in the context of consent that was worked out between DOJ attorneys and counsel for Secretary Clinton.” He said the attorney’s kept them from searching on the foundation and there was “a significant filter team that was put in place to work through the various terms of the various consent agreements.”
DOJ Deal With FBI on Clinton Foundation——In one of the most explosive parts of Strzok’s testimony, he revealed that the Department of Justice struck a deal with the FBI not to investigate the Clinton Foundation emails.
**************
This will be the lead story on CNN all week long. NOT!
“Were you given access to those emails as part of the investigation,” Somer’s asks Strzok. “We were not. We did not have access,” Strzok said. He said the FBI eventually was granted access to the Clinton’s server, but only after negotiating with Clinton’s attorneys.
The FBI “had it voluntarily in the context — in the case of the servers, voluntarily in the context of consent that was worked out between DOJ attorneys and counsel for Secretary Clinton.” He said the attorney’s kept them from searching on the foundation and there was “a significant filter team that was put in place to work through the various terms of the various consent agreements.”
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
two sets of laws?
who was on the “filter team” cheryl mills & huma abedin?
“The FBI “had it voluntarily in the context — in the case of the servers, voluntarily in the context of consent that was worked out between DOJ attorneys and counsel for Secretary Clinton.” He said the attorney’s kept them from searching on the foundation and there was “a significant filter team that was put in place to work through the various terms of the various consent agreements.”
Hillary Clinton set up a completely illegal server with classified information on it and worse but the FBI negotiates with her lawyers on what information they can look at?
This is the definition of insanity. Why didn’t the FBI raid Hillary Clinton’s home and seize the server when it was discovered? They sent more armed people after Roger Stone over nothing than Osama bin Laden.
Yet, the FBI raids Roger Stone's house with full tactical gear just before dawn. For what purpose? Stone was arrested and charged with lying to investigators, obstruction of justice and witness tampering; the Special Counsel’s Office filed a seven-count indictment.
Okay, those charges may have some validity, but still don't compare to the national security breach of Hillary's secret server and transferring Top Secret communiques to it and her closest advisor (Huma) via email, who forwarded many of those TS emails to her husband's personal computer, Anthony Weiner. He is a convicted sex offender and pedophile.
If ever interviewed by Fed, State, Local LEO having committed no crime connected to their investigation. Consider the following:
Also, when they send in detective after detective to re-question, just say, "I already told you. It's on record" and say NO more. That is a classic perjury trap. When they start to intimidate with financial and family background investigations/threats...say nothing.
The fix was in.