Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’m not sure I understand this. It says Congress appropriated money to the state department that President Trump did not want. My understanding is the Congress can appropriate money, but that the president is not required to spend anything appropriated. I thought his main limit was that he couldn’t spend money that was not appropriated, but not that he is forced to spend everything appropriated.


2 posted on 03/11/2019 6:13:07 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

That used to be the case. Now the President must ask for rescission of funds but it is rarely, if ever, granted by Congress. See Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 which changed the law.


3 posted on 03/11/2019 6:18:25 PM PDT by Lakewood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRhino

Corect.

It is also correct the president can prioritize what laws he wants to spend time and money on enforcing.


12 posted on 03/11/2019 7:13:52 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRhino

Seems like you understand it pretty well.

Trump wants them to feel the pain, so they have to cut staff.

Department lawyers are probably fighting to spend every penny Congress provides.

This place is infested with leftists soaking up those federal government paychex!


21 posted on 03/11/2019 10:22:50 PM PDT by pacificus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson