How is tax money paying for sex changing of a FEW people representative to the whole of the tax paying public? Socialism at its worst. Ruling needs to be challenged!
“the womens’ medical providers determined the surgeries were medically necessary to treat their gender dysphoria”
How is this not straight-up medical fraud? Whoever made this determination ought to be prosecuted.
No, I don’t think so.
Not as long as I have anything to say about it.
Since when do I and my fellow citizens have to pay for elective surgeries?
Are they going to pay for nose jobs, face lifts, and other forms of cosmetic surgery too?
Where do they get these lame ass judges?
Are they going to cover cosmetic surgery for people who feel ugly?
I do not understand what court, and on what basis, ever recognized the state of being “transgender” as a real phenomenon.
It’s one thing for a man to think he’s a woman. It’s quite another thing for the courts to agree.
Does anybody claiming to be a Republican pay attention to who gets appointed to courts like this?
What good are legislators if they refuse to impeach and remove black-robe fascists for lawless conduct?
Time to muster Committees of Safety.
Wisconsin has an SC election coming up
So, which is it? You “treat” a disorder/disease, but the deviants insist that it is not a disorder.
How absolutely convoluted.
Pathetic.
_______________________________
I’d expect to see this in California, New York, or Illinois, but it truly is surprising and pathetic to see this in IOWA!
But the ACLU argued that the womens’ medical providers determined the surgeries were medically necessary to treat their gender dysphoria.
If not, it doesn’t treat the dysphoria.