To: TChad
It made no sense that he had not been identified from all those clear photos. He was identified a while back.
He's also known to be an ANTIFA member, but you won't read about that in the papers.
18 posted on
03/01/2019 3:45:18 PM PST by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: bagster
He was identified a while back. I believe you, but where was he identified?
25 posted on
03/01/2019 3:50:28 PM PST by
TChad
To: bagster
[ He's also known to be an ANTIFA member, but you won't read about that in the papers. ]
Well, that figures....
50 posted on
03/01/2019 5:26:48 PM PST by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: bagster
He's also known to be an ANTIFA member, No real evidence that he's ANTIFA. One perhaps photo and a bunch of people saying he is, doesn't make it true.
Going forward, we *MAY* get some evidence he's ANTIFA, but I've yet to see anything but speculation.
95 posted on
03/02/2019 5:46:58 AM PST by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson