Posted on 02/23/2019 3:26:53 PM PST by PJ-Comix
If CNN's Chris Cillizza were the District Attorney on a Perry Mason episode, the famed lawyer could just sit back and relax because the prosecutor would make the case for him that the defendant was not guilty.
This is basically the absurdity that silly Cillizza performed in his Friday . After going through a lot of effort pointing out how the Donald Trump 2016 campaign could have colluded with the Russians, Cillizza concludes that there is no proof that such collusion took place. Case closed. So why did he even bother to try to make it in the first place? Perhaps someone out there could channel the network jester to explain his bizarre thought patterns to us.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
He;s a childish DOPE!
Other than Hillary Clinton’s claims of collusion, why is there ANY suggestion that it occurred? There isn’t. It is only Clinton’s absurd claims that provoked and fueled this nonsense.
They will end up just “deeming” that there was collusion.
The lefts friends require no evidence for others to be guilty. #metoo, Hillary, jussie liar smolett, chrissy blakely ford. With zero evidence or false concocted evidence, the lefts strawman scapegoat enemies are show trialed by them and their media cheerleaders as guilty. Beyond question.
Now after two years an enemy of the left has been investigated for over 2 years and theres no evidence, they admit it. But still guilty. We actually have evidence of hillarys email national security crimes, russian uranium one for dollars deal, weiners laptop, and nothing happens to her or those covering it up for her.
There is no proof Chrissy, you ignorant schmuck!
Yeah, and the 2016 Trump campaign could have colluded with Bigfoot. Sure, there's no proof but...
I can tell you, right now, what WON’T be in Mueller’s report- nothing about Obama, the Clintons, the FBI, DOJ, Lynch, Holder, Strojk, Comey, McCabe...shall I go on?
Ooopsie... Wikileaks has indicated that the messages they posted were not obtained from 'the Russians' or another foreign state player.
It’s because they like their made-up world with their made-up news stories more than they like reality.
“Orange Man Bad”.
How does one make a case if there is no proof?
So what would “collusion with russia” consist of? How would we recognize it - if it bit us on the ass?
CNN circus is like the fight of the clowns, who will take center ring when the circus gets underway
CNN circus is like the fight of the clowns, who will take center ring when the circus gets underway
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.