Did you read the article? They actually do quote some. They also refer to agendas and other documents.
Is it too much to ask that we don’t dismiss anything we don’t like as fake news? I am not going to ignore the story because there are some un-named sources. As I said, this is not the first article indicating a move in a different direction on immigration away from JOBS FOR AMERICANS FIRST.
And OK we get that:
1. You don’t admire journalists. But did you ever think that perhaps the sources insisted they not be quoted. It happens—I have been interviewed by press and requested no names.
2. You are loyal to Trump. And likely any article or person w/an issue is problematic.
But I am loyal to Trump too, and on this issue, like Obamacare reform, and past budget/CR deals, I and some of us dared disagree with Trump’s position (much of which was framed by elite republicans and self-promoters LIKE Jared).
...IMHO Trump should not be entrusting this issue to his not particularly conservative son-in-law who likely would have never been a Trump voter had he not married Ivanka.
Not happy with this direction immigration is taking, and I am not afraid to contact WH and ask about it and comment on it. Is that too much to ask?
Signed,
Mr. or Ms. Freedom
See my #43. This is a crock.
This is how “journalism” works these days.
“Somebody” said ...
Do you want your local newspaper reporting what “Somebody” said about you?
This is the kind of crap Freepers FIGHT against.
Yeesh.