[walford]

Why would it be necessary to enact legislation that exempts convicted pedophiles from mandatory sexual predator registry to protect homosexuals if they are not over-represented in perpetrating sex crimes against minors under the age of consent?

[Kriggerel]

Gotta protect that sacred casting-couch. X.x

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

A reasonable alternative would be to create a bounty on molesters open to gentlemen who have served time in prison. We can sympathize to some extent about the difficulty of finding honest work after they have done their time, so say a $5,000-$10,000 cash prize for smiting such degenerates unpunished by the law, would do much for their reintroduction to society.

[Impala64ssa]

Who did Scott WIENER get to co-sponsor this POS? Buster Hyman? Peter Long?

[Fedora]

Scott Wiener

Wiener joined Assembly member Todd Gloria to author SB 239, which aims to change the laws that make it a felony to expose someone to HIV without their knowledge and consent.[23] Wiener said that the laws unfairly single out HIV-positive people.[24] The bill passed and was signed by Governor Jerry Brown on October 6, 2017.[25]

Wiener partnered with state Senator Toni Atkins to author SB 179 to create a third, non-binary gender option on government documents.[26][27]

Wiener authored SB 219, which protects the rights of LGBT seniors living in long-term care facilities.[28] The bill was opposed by groups who argued the bill criminalized bathroom gender designations and would force care providers to address those under their care with gender appropriate language.[29] Wiener called these arguments "transphobic" and "absurd".[30]

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

The whole damn place needs to drop off into the pacific.

[b4me]

2 wrongs don’t make a right

[King Moonracer]

Does Epstein have a house there yet? Bubba?

[Wuli]

The present law already has a loop hole, if it is “vaginal intercourse” sex that is involved, and that loop hole relieves the offender from the no more 10 years older than the victim standard, IF a judge in the case finds cause for that relief. It apparently does not allow for a judge to provide that same relief if it is not a case involving vaginal intercourse, if it involves some other sexual acts.

The question concerning the new suggested law is if it goes beyond providing that same relief, in cases where it is not vaginal intercourse and just exempts ALL such offenders - based on the no more than 10 years older standard - from having to file with the sex offenders registry, instead of like the other cases, as it is now, putting that question in the hands of the judge hearing the case.

In no case does the matter of a conviction of the crime seem to come into question, just whether or not being put on the offenders registry is mandatory or not.

[Deplorable American1776]

The law is called ‘The NAMBLA Protection Act of 2019’. I hope they’ll defeat this.

[NetAddicted]

Exactly.