Democrats and the NYT conspire to create another charge of obstruction.
These Democrats are sooooooooooooooo jealous of our President. Jealousy can be an obsessive ugly thing. We are witnessing it.
That is not obstruction. It is called MANAGEMENT. Executives do it all the time.
Oh, no! Not another bombshell .
In related news: The sun rose in the east this morning.
Yawn.
3.....2.....1......oops, we got it wrong. Sorry.
The Times reported..that the president asked then-acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker late last year to put U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman in charge of the investigation into...Michael Cohen. Cohen pleaded guilty last year to bank fraud, tax fraud and making payments...
IOW, even if this were true, it took place after Cohen was busted. Whitaker was appointed in mid November. Cohen pleaded guilty last August!
Bombshells. Is that what the ‘RATS are calling Cheech and Chong “bombers” these days?
MSMedia: We need to quit jumping the gun on these stories. It keeps biting us in the...NY Times, obstruction, report...PANT...PANT...PANT
It’s funny to watch a dying corrupt entity’s last gasps of attempting to remain relevant. Die already, NY slimes.
But it was the formal written recommendation of Rosenstein and the screams of practically every single Liberal Democrat - especially Hilliary - that Trump HAD TO fire Comey! How soon they forget! But we won't...
They want to derail any questioning of McCabe, Comey, the Ohrs, Weissman, Strzok-Page, etc. PERIOD.
Lots of unknown Democrats trying to make a name for themselves. I’m surprised they haven’t come out in defense of Jussie Smollet. That would be just up their alley (full of rats).
grasping at straws
Easy fix: beat him in 2020
This story was created to cover up the coup news. I can’t see how the story equals obstruction of justice or attempted obstruction. The unethical thing here was allowing anti Trump staffers to go after Cohen.
Calling BS on BS is... de rigueur. To do otherwise is an admission of guilt.
This is a DNC press release. Literally everything in the article is coming from Democrat officials.
“If the NYT report is true”... if there’s a question it means it’s yet another unfalsifiable allegation. Maggie Habermann again?
It's just more manufactured noise in an attempt to stall the inevitable.
Yeah, because the president doesn’t have the right to choose those people he wants to assist him, or know what’s going on in his own justice department, because...um...um...well...because we don’t like him! Disgusting worms!