Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/20/2019 1:32:07 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Boom! There goes asset forfeiture.

I’s a good day today.


2 posted on 02/20/2019 1:33:57 PM PST by sevlex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Good. Now how about the “Shall not be infringed” phrase in the second amendment?


6 posted on 02/20/2019 1:41:49 PM PST by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s not the Benjamins it about the Wall


7 posted on 02/20/2019 1:43:53 PM PST by keving (We the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I wonder if the Eighth Amendment applies to $135,000 fines imposed on bakers who offended a fag.


10 posted on 02/20/2019 1:46:09 PM PST by fwdude (Think about it: Blacks were made slaves in Africa, but were made free men in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

In this case, the plaintiff was actually tried and found guilty of the offense. Many of these forfeitures occur without a trial and often without even an arrest. The inference is that those actions are out of the question going forward. But, in this crazy justice land that we live in these days, it may require another case to put an end to that questionable actions.


11 posted on 02/20/2019 1:46:33 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

9-0...........Boy, that was a close one!.................


13 posted on 02/20/2019 1:47:28 PM PST by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Remember the oral arguments in this case? Sure you do.


That’s too funny. Most people aren’t USSC geeks.


18 posted on 02/20/2019 1:51:33 PM PST by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Fine!

Now let's get rid of RICO... Clearly the most vile theft ring in the Nation...

23 posted on 02/20/2019 1:56:38 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. Yes, conspiracy theorists, she’s alive.

Uh, no.

Corpseburg's law clerks wrote the opinion for Supreme Court seat #6. They also voted seat #6 for the dead gal.

24 posted on 02/20/2019 1:59:01 PM PST by an amused spectator (Mitt Romney, Chuck Schumer's p*ssboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

And they give the easy one to Ruth “Fuzzy Buzzy” Ginsberg. Or a clerk of hers. Put her in hospice and send the clerks home. Justice Thomas did a nice take on that!


26 posted on 02/20/2019 2:00:42 PM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Not only did Roberts hand it off, he handed it to the Court’s senior liberal...the Court is desperate to prove to the public that this woman is still capable of performing her duties - else loss of public confidence - as though that hasn't happened already.....
28 posted on 02/20/2019 2:07:25 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Here's the entire Opinion and concurrences (PDF)

I agree with the writer. The oral arguments on this were fairly telling. One of the justices (can't remember who) got the attorney for Indiana to admit that it would be OK with him if the state confiscated a Bugatti from someone merely for driving 5 miles over the speed limit. Even just reading the transcript, you could pretty much tell the justice was floored by this admission.

30 posted on 02/20/2019 2:12:12 PM PST by zeugma (Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Damn! That’s a big one.


31 posted on 02/20/2019 2:16:25 PM PST by CJ Wolf (Free. Wwg1wga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Excessive Fines?


32 posted on 02/20/2019 2:19:03 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Feels like a sign of respect that Roberts trusted RBG with it.

Feels more like a swan song to me.

33 posted on 02/20/2019 2:22:24 PM PST by Michael.SF. (California: knowingly give someone aids: misdemeanor. Give them a straw, go to jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

You all wanna see something pertaining to this?
Read this one. I was on the land after he completed a couple of the ponds. Moose were there, geese and ducks on the water and then the GD scum SOBs from under the bridge got their dander up. A good few DNR boys went into hiding around there for a while..for their safety.

https://www.mackinac.org/3963


36 posted on 02/20/2019 2:27:50 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Ah yes. The determination of what rights are Fundamental is a creation of Scotus itself. It has little to do with our history and everything with ensconcing social justice in the wrap of constitutionality.

Among scotus-determined fundamental rights are the franchise, abortion, fag marriage, and now this decision.

It is all nonsense because Scotus does not regard the right to life itself as fundamental.


43 posted on 02/20/2019 3:13:31 PM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson