There are all kinds of unconstitutional government edicts. How about the ‘gag order’ that prevents Roger Stone (and many other defendants in criminal cases) from speaking about their case in public? How is that not a 1A violation, as well as a 4A, 5A and 6A violation?
I agree with you, but it is a question of whether one put in the position is willing to accept the consequences of fighting or flaunting the edict. It shouldn’t be this way. But it is, more and more...
Well, one could simply behave like a demolib would and ignore any court ‘noises’ and proceed to do as they like without consequence. I believe selling ones soul is a prerequisite though.