Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

Profitability was never an issue. The primary purpose of the line was to provide a public service, which meant that it didn’t need to be profitable due to the fact that it would always be supported by a state subsidy.


10 posted on 02/14/2019 11:51:05 AM PST by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill & Publius available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Publius

Prop. 1a specifically forbid subsidies for the HSR project:
“The planned passenger service by the authority in the corridor or usable segment thereof will not require a local, state, or federal operating subsidy.
and
“...the planned passenger train service to be provided by the authority, or pursuant to its authority, will not require operating subsidy”

https://vig.cdn.sos.ca.gov/2008/general/pdf-guide/suppl-complete-guide.pdf#prop1a

But the HSR board ignored several provisions of Prop. 1a since 2008....starting with a “blended system” on the S.F. peninsula which violated the “2 hour 40 minute” “high-speed” provision.


37 posted on 02/14/2019 6:43:23 PM PST by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson