Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: piasa

MAY 1, 2017 : (DOD’S ADAM LOVINGER’S SECURITY CLEARANCE IS PULLED ) Adam Lovinger, a senior official of the Defense Department’s Office of Net Assessment (ONA), had his security clearance yanked on May 1, 2017, and has been relegated to performing clerical chores ever since. ONA analyzes future threats and ways to defeat them. —— Pro-Trump Pentagon Analyst Was Stripped of His Security Clearance by Obama Holdovers , PJ Media ^ | AUGUST 17, 2018 | DEBRA HEINE , Posted on ?8?/?18?/?2018? ?12?:?18?:?50? ?PM by E. Pluribus Unum
****************
>>>> AUGUST 17, 2018 : () A Pentagon analyst was stripped of his security clearance by Obama holdovers after he complained of suspicious government contracts with Stefan Halper, the FBI informant who spied on the Trump presidential campaign in 2016, the Washington Times reported. The pro-Trump analyst also apparently ruffled feathers when he blew the whistle on an alleged sweetheart deal with a woman Chelsea Clinton referred to as her “best friend.”
Adam Lovinger, a senior official of the Defense Department’s Office of Net Assessment (ONA), had his security clearance yanked on May 1, 2017, and has been relegated to performing clerical chores ever since. ONA analyzes future threats and ways to defeat them.
Lovinger believes that ONA retaliated against him because he had complained to his bosses about the questionable contracts in the fall of 2016.
After his security clearance was revoked, Lovinger filed a whistleblower reprisal complaint with the Defense Department inspector general against James H. Baker, director of ONA. The complaint also names Washington Headquarters Services, a Pentagon support agency that handled the Halper contracts, which totaled hundreds of thousands of dollars.
“It was a topic of conversation within the office,” Lovinger’s attorney, Sean M. Bigley, told the Washington Times. “What is Halper doing, and why is he being paid astronomically more than others similarly situated?”
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...—— Pro-Trump Pentagon Analyst Was Stripped of His Security Clearance by Obama Holdovers
PJ Media ^ | AUGUST 17, 2018 | DEBRA HEINE , Posted on ?8?/?18?/?2018? ?12?:?18?:?50? ?PM by E. Pluribus Unum
****************
According to the complaint, Lovinger sent an internal email to his superiors in October 2016, concerning “the moral hazard associated with the Washington Headquarters Services contracting with Stefan Halper.” It pointed out that Halper was hired to “conduct foreign relations,” a job that should be confined to government employees.


102 posted on 02/14/2019 9:58:33 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: piasa

MAY 2, 2017: (NEW HUMA ABEDIN EMAILS [20090101 THROUGH 20130201] REVEALED) Judicial Watch: New Huma Abedin Emails Reveal Additional Instances of Clinton Sending and..., JudicialWatch ^ | 05/02/17 | Judical Watch Press Release , Posted on 5?/?2?/?2017? ?7?:?08?:?47? ?PM by blueyon
“”Judicial Watch: New Huma Abedin Emails Reveal Additional Instances of Clinton Sending and Receiving Classified Emails Through Unsecure Server”””
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released 894 pages of new State Department documents, including previously unreleased email exchanges in which former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was sent additional classified information through her unsecure clintonmail.com email account by top aide Huma Abedin. The Abedin emails also include repeated instances of Clinton’s detailed daily schedules being sent to top Clinton Foundation officials at unsecured email addresses.
The records were produced for Judicial Watch by the State Department from the non-state.gov email accounts of Abedin. The records were obtained in response to a court order from a May 5, 2015, lawsuit filed against the State Department (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00684)) after it failed to respond to a March 18, 2015, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking:
All emails of official State Department business received or sent by former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin from January 1, 2009 through February 1, 2013 using a non-“state.gov” email address.
The new documents included 29 email exchanges not previously turned over to the State Department, bringing the known total to date to at least 317 emails that were not part of the 55,000 pages of emails that Clinton turned over to the State Department. These records further appear to contradict statements by Clinton that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government emails were turned over to the State Department.
(Excerpt) Read more at judicialwatch.org …

**************

MAY 2017 EARLY : (FBI COMEY TESTIMONY [LIE] ABOUT THE NUMBER OF ABEDIN’S EMAILS GETS “CORRECTED” -—See JUDICIAL WATCH FOIA REQUEST ) after his [Comey’s] previous testimony in early May — when the FBI issued a statement to correct an error in his testimony after he seriously under-reported the number of e-mails found on Huma Abedin’s computer in 2016. 18 posted on ?6?/?12?/?2017? ?9?:?57?:?45? ?PM by Alberta’s Child
*****************
MAY 3, 2017 : (COMEY MISLEADS SENATORS, TESTIFYING THAT HE HAD NEVER BEEN AN ANONYMOUS SOURCE IN NEWS REPORTS RELATING TO THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION) James Comey may have misled senators on May 3, when he testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee that he had never been an anonymous source in news reports related to the Russia investigation. By that time, he had already leaked several private conversations he had with President Trump to his friend Benjamin Wittes, editor-in-chief of the blog Lawfare and former editorial writer for the Washington Post.(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...-— Public Accounts by Friends Show James Comey Leaked While FBI Director, Breithbart, June 22, 2017, Kristina Wong

********************

GRASSLEY: Okay, moving on to another subject, the New York Times recently reported that the FBI had found a troubling email among the ones the Russians hacked from Democrat operatives. The email reportedly provided assurances that Attorney General Lynch would protect Secretary Clinton by making sure the FBI investigation “didn’t go too far.”
How, and when, did you first learn of this document? Also, who sent it and who received it?
COMEY: That’s not a question I can answer in this forum, Mr. Chairman, because it would call for a classified response. I have briefed leadership of the intelligence committees on that particular issue, but I can’t talk about it here.
GRASSLEY: You can expect me to follow up with you on that point.
COMEY: Sure.
They Continued
GRASSLEY: What steps did the FBI take to determine whether Attorney General Lynch had actually given assurances that the political fix was in no matter what? Did the FBI interview the person who wrote the email? If not, why not?
COMEY: I have to give you the same answer. I can’t talk about that in an unclassified setting.
GRASSLEY: Okay, then you can expect me to follow up on that. I asked the FBI to provide this email to the committee before today’s hearing. Why haven’t you done so and will you provide it by the end of this week?
COMEY: Again, to react to that, I have to give a classified answer and I can’t give it sitting here.
GRASSLEY: So that means you can give me the email?
COMEY: I’m not confirming there was an email, sir. I can’t — the subject is classified and in an appropriate forum I’d be happy to brief you on it. But I can’t do it in an open hearing.
GRASSLEY: I assume that the other members of the committee could have access to that briefing if they wanted?
**********
This story is starting to break; Google “grassley comey lynch political cover” to find other sources.
The take away is that the Lynch document/memo hacked by Russia made Comey fear a leak would impugn the integrity of the FBI Clinton email probe.
So if the Russians had the document but did NOT leak it then it shows the Russians were favoring Hillary not Trump.
Put another way the Russians had a document that would have been very damaging to Hillary but the Russian not leak it. Much to the advantage of Hillary.
here is a good article by Brietbart:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/05/james-comey-avoids-testifying-on-dem-doc-reportedly-showing-ag-lynch-protecting-hillary/
1 posted on ?5?/?7?/?2017? ?9?:?23?:?11? ?PM by Kid Shelleen


106 posted on 02/14/2019 10:04:21 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson