What would you call Global Warming? They sell it as true science.
NOT true science.
That 97% consensus?
A group of mostly social “scientists” at a couple of Australian universities. It was a reply by email poll, so only true activists answered it.*
Does the climate change? Yes. Has it gotten 1 degree Celsius warmer since 1880? Yes. All of these things are measurable.
However, the idea that doubling the carbon dioxide load in the atmosphere will cause the global temperature to go up by 8 to 10 degrees Celsius is laughable... It is not happening. They tried to say the heating was taking place first in the deep oceans, but THEN when they were all toasty warm, the air would finally catch up and get really hot.
And they call THIS science? No, just no. It isn’t.
And guess what? It is now believed by many that the low levels of CO2 in the atmosphere is an ice age phenomena that actually harms plant life, and more CO2 might mean a greening of the Earth; more green than the past 3 million years or so. A very strong theory, full of facts and data, is being formulated on this.
*Things you’ll NEVER hear about on TV.
Global Warming is an hypothesis, proposing that increased atmospheric CO2, caused by humans burning ancient carbon deposits, will cause catastrophic warming of the earth. The ONLY 'scientific' evidence that supports this hypothesis is the result of computer models of the earth's climate. These models are demonstrably WRONG. The models don't include several critical factors that are known to influence earth's climate, including El Niño cycles, cloud formation, cosmic radiation, and even solar radiation. That's right, known variations in the sun's warmth, the only thing keeping us from freezing to death at absolute zero, are not included in the models.
REAL scientific experiments have demonstrated that the mentioned model exclusions can explain he temperature history of earth without including "greenhouse gas", CO2. That alone, as quoted by Einstein, "only one is needed to prove me wrong", is scientific proof that he global warming hypothesis is dead wrong.
A few thoughts to ponder.
1. 1645 Low solar activity begins, to be called the Maunder Minimum. Ice will cut off access to Greenland, canals in Holland will routinely freeze solid, and glaciers will advance in the Alps. This period of low solar activity will last to 1715. - We appear to be at the start of another one of these low solar activity periods
2. Green New Deal - For those who do not remember - Stalin had FIVE year plans - these lead to Lake Baikal to be destroyed when Stalin insisted that Cotton be grown in that part of Russia.
3. 1632 Galileo publishes his ideas about the universe. Intellectuals across Europe applaud. The Church prohibits further sales of the book, and Galileo is ordered to appear before the Inquisition in Rome. - As far as what is and what is not science - there appears to be nothing new under the Sun - The Democrats are the latest re-incarnation of the Inquisitors
1497 Boys working under Savonarola collect from homes things associated with moral laxity: mirrors, cosmetics, pictures, books, fine dresses, the works of immoral poets. Savonarola has these burned. Renaissance art work is lost. Pope Alexander VI excommunicates Savonarola. - Sure looks like the Democrats
May 23, 1498, this man and two Dominican disciples were hanged and burned, still professing their adherence to the Church. - So is this what is coming for Occasional-Cortex and Nanci?