Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Human Rights court to deliver huge ruling on surveillance
wnd.com ^ | 2/8/3029 | unknown

Posted on 02/09/2019 7:46:44 AM PST by rktman

The European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber is preparing to deliver a major ruling on government surveillance tactics, reports Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin.

The court has agreed to review Big Brother Watch v. U.K., a case that already has resulted in condemnation of federal spying from a panel of the court.

Amnesty International explained the case centers on Britain’s “bulk surveillance powers” and will be viewed as a precedent elsewhere.

Amnesty leads a coalition of human rights organizations seeking a definitive judgment that would end bulk interception of communications.

The issue also has been in the courts in the United States, where the bulk interception of cell system data has been challenged.

Lucy Claridge, the director of strategic litigation at Amnesty, said, “The U.K. government’s mass surveillance practices are way beyond the pale … people’s rights to privacy and freedom of expression are not expendable commodities.”

Just months ago, Liberty, Privacy International and Amnesty International were among the 14 rights groups and two individuals that won a landmark victory at the ECtHR. After a five year legal battle, judges found the U.K. surveillance regime revealed by the whistleblower Edward Snowden was illegal.

Amnesty reported the court’s decision found the historic bulk interception regime violated the right to privacy protected by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and to free expression, protected by Article 10.

But the privacy groups decided the judgment did not go far enough with regard to the unlawfulness of bulk interception powers and the fundamental shortcomings in inter-state intelligence sharing based on communications intercepts.

They moved to have the court’s Grand Chamber take up the case.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: eu; whocares
Owwwww! The e-yewwwwwww human rights court and am-nasty international. Well that ought to put the skerred into snoopers huh?

"... right to privacy protected by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and to free expression, protected by Article 10."

Unless deemed necessary by the e-yewwww snoopers. Besides, isn't Brexit about to happen?

1 posted on 02/09/2019 7:46:44 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

“After a five year legal battle, judges found the U.K. surveillance regime revealed by the whistleblower Edward Snowden was illegal.”

No wonder they want to shut him up in any way necessary.

L


2 posted on 02/09/2019 7:48:26 AM PST by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. DonÂ’t pretend it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Strongly worded letter to follow.


3 posted on 02/09/2019 9:25:20 AM PST by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson