Posted on 02/05/2019 11:16:26 PM PST by knighthawk
Go eat a sandwich you self absorbed egotistical anorexic egotist.
What does the loon do for a living anyway?
I don’t think she could sell many books these days.
Perhaps Maher gives her an allowance.
Trump was going to get the wall by vetoing Ryan and McConnell’s business-as-usual Chamber-of-Commerce bills instead of caving and signing. And then caving and signing again.
(PS you may want to lay off the booze or whatever that it is that causes you to do the name-calling and keyboard-rage-clown stuff. It’s a bit pathetic.)
He signed those Republicans’ no-wall bills. Several times. No veto. No veto threats. Just signed them.
Shrewdly, Trump’s speech was heavy with popular measures and well-crafted emotional appeals, which is just what the occasion called for as a way to ease the tension and hard feelings of the government shutdown and battle over the border wall. The hard measures on immigration and the border wall are still coming, which is what Ann (and the rest of us) yearn for.
You love Symbolism, so be it.
LOL...so Trump vetos Ryan's crap stuff and then what?
I asked YOU for details and all you posted is a childish, thoughtless rant and heaped calumny on me to boot.
Run away; you're out of your depth and an uneducated hysteric to boot.
Yeah, and immediately.
It would have been an very drastic move for the GOP leadership to rebel against their new mandate-holding President and cobble together an override with Democrat votes. When was the last time that happened?
But we’ll never know regarding Trump and the GOP congress. Because nothing was even tried.
You love making excuses, so be it.
Thank you for sharing both your graphic murder fantasies and your judgement of other people’s online conduct.
There was also this:
Trump said, in a line absent from his prepared remarks, that he wanted legal immigration “in the largest numbers ever.” Never mind that last year he endorsed large cuts to legal immigration, and rejected a Democratic offer of funding for a wall in part because it did not include those cuts . . .
There was also this:
Trump said, in a line absent from his prepared remarks, that he wanted legal immigration “in the largest numbers ever.” Never mind that last year he endorsed large cuts to legal immigration, and rejected a Democratic offer of funding for a wall in part because it did not include those cuts . . .
Really? You don’t think he should have built the bulk of an actual, as promised, concrete and rebar wall out of the defense budget by now?
What’s up, Ann? You losing your audience? You have
a great love for writing books, obviously. But it
now appears you no longer have an interest in selling
what you write. You are hated by the left which is
why so many on the right have loved you. Now, you
find it necessary to piss off your base, those who
buy your books. To what end, Annie? It doesn’t bother
me to hear some Trump criticism. It doesn’t hurt.
Your stuff gets to sounding like you see yourself
as losing relevance.
The lefties never bought your books. Now your old
reliable are going to be dumping on you too. Time
for John Taffer to jump in and do a bar rehab.
She used to write for Reagan too, and did some of his famous speeches. (That’s when I first heard of her and liked her).
Of course she has to write what the guy wants to say, so of course I liked her in her Reagan years!
Ann has to learn ... He is President for All,not just for her. She’s due for an webby “time out” at this location
I thought she lived in FL?
Coulter is not going to be a happy camper until we get the wall.
And Trump deleted that rhetorically excessive line. Why was it in the draft? Foolishly, the American public has a romantic affection for legal immigration even though it is now occurring in such numbers as to menace the country’s future. Therefore, as a matter of strategy, the battle to curtail immigration must begin with the strongest argument, which is against illegal immigration and the worst categories of legal immigration — and such an argument must be coupled with praise for legal immigrants.
Sounds like Ann is trying to make herself relevant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.