I'm not wrong, and I've read more on this than is justified. It's an issue been kicking around for a decade now.
You can read a lot about many wrong-headed ideas. It's not how much you can read, it's what you read. This is silly birther nonsense and there is no basis for it in the law. If you're born in the US you are a natural born citizen. End of story. That has always been the case.
The phrase to the founder meant the same as a "natural born subject" meant to Englishmen. Just substitute "citizen" for "subject".
You are simply wrong— especially in the kamala ding dong case. Neither parents are US citizens or were US citizens, and no proper use of the “5 years in the country before birthing crapola either”. This is not going to fly. No matter, the biotch has a scummy enough mobbed up past to eliminate early on, as does Julian Castro.
Please explain to me how, if the child of two native born US citizens,is born IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY— they are not ever, never a citizen of that country. We will bring our standards up to the “globalist” one, instead of having their “leavening” standards applied to us. That game is over.
The usage of the post Civil War Amendment is improper. And this WILL be addressed. We aren’t allowing another obamaumao put up job from the Hawaii (former territory, favourite for redocumenting foreign agents, including Soviet/Russian ones, with fake birth certificates. We’ve seen that episode.