Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"....California Special Districts magazine expects the CCC will predict a sea-level rise of 2.5-5.5 feet and the elimination of 31-67 percent of Southern California beaches by the year 2100." Yes, recreational marijuana is legal in cali now and it sure looks like the property thieves have been taking advantage of it. 2.5 to 5.5 feet? Really? Is there an "algore signature brand" of weed available? Holy smokin' dumbasses......
1 posted on 01/16/2019 9:27:01 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rktman

Gee, that should make a lots of celebs happy when they have their Malibu and Newport Beach beachfront properties seized (Yeah right).

Maybe they can convert their “shacks” to houseboats.

To say this state is run by gangs of unelected boards and commission and idiots is not a stretch, by any means of your imagination.

The Disney State has gone to seed. Surf’s Up!!


2 posted on 01/16/2019 9:30:26 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Communist totalitarianism increases.


3 posted on 01/16/2019 9:31:49 AM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

When Kalifornia and the Feds want your land, they’ll do whatever it takes to get it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Donald_P._Scott


4 posted on 01/16/2019 9:32:16 AM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

How many farts
could a snail darter fart,
if a darter could fart darts?


7 posted on 01/16/2019 9:34:18 AM PST by budj (combat vet, 2nd of 3 generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
...and the elimination of 31-67 percent of Southern California beaches by the year 2100.

Beaches move all the time. If they should lose 2/3(?) of their beaches, then new ones will be created.

If they can't guesstimate better than 1/3 of a whole that it isn't a study, its a PR blast.

8 posted on 01/16/2019 9:34:51 AM PST by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

(Rummaging through trunk) “There’s a yellow vest in here somewhere...”


10 posted on 01/16/2019 9:34:54 AM PST by Yollopoliuhqui
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

The Coastal Commission has been doing this since the 70’s. This is nothing new. Only thing new are the addition houses in the Commission’s sights this time.


11 posted on 01/16/2019 9:36:14 AM PST by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Acquire thousands of beachfront properties paying fair market value?

(Which is what Eminent Domain requires)

The cost would be enormous!


12 posted on 01/16/2019 9:36:36 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

All those Malibu liberals will be screaming!..................


13 posted on 01/16/2019 9:36:38 AM PST by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
Dumb, but that's what you get with leftists.

I would have no objection if California drew a projected high tide line based on its expectations of sea level rise, and then said it would not support any infrastructure development or storm rebuilding below that limit. Want a house on the beach? Fine. Go buy the land. Your money, your property, your risk. But you are on your own. No public access road, no public funds for utilities, etc.

We should have done this many years ago on the barrier islands on the East Coast. Don't take people's property. Just say that we're not going to throw good money after bad rebuilding after the next hurricane.

14 posted on 01/16/2019 9:38:45 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Then they can sell the property to the Chicoms for sub bases. This way CA can improve their budget and become a Chinese protectorate/colony.


15 posted on 01/16/2019 9:38:58 AM PST by grumpygresh (is this the Rubicon year? (I'm not talking about the wine))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

California is run by gangsters.


18 posted on 01/16/2019 9:40:17 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Duplicate post.


20 posted on 01/16/2019 9:41:06 AM PST by READINABLUESTATE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Global Warming sure is good to the California government!


21 posted on 01/16/2019 9:41:32 AM PST by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Give us your water front property. It is for “the chulrun”.


25 posted on 01/16/2019 9:42:22 AM PST by gathersnomoss (Grace and Dignity Will Win The Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson