Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Times wasn't always so suspicious of 'secretive communications' with Russia
Washington Examiner ^ | January 15, 2019 02:13 PM | Eddie Scarry

Posted on 01/15/2019 5:59:49 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

Newsrooms turned their attention again this week to the never-ending Russia investigation and their storylines on President Trump’s relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin. So it’s as good a time as any to recall the New York Times’ posture on Russia before 2016.

The Times editorial board on Monday listed all the ways Trump is perceived by Democrats and liberals in the news media as working to advance Russian interests, including his “secretive communications with the Russian president, Vladimir Putin.” In this case “secretive communications” is short for: Trump had a meeting with Putin, but Trump asked that the American interpreter not share details of the encounter with others. (So “secretive” was the meeting that our top diplomat, then-Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, was present for it.)

But the Times was much more generous in describing what you might otherwise call “secretive communications” with Russia when Barack Obama was president. In 2012, during his re-election campaign, Obama was caught by a hot mic whispering to then-President Dmitry Medvedev that he was potentially willing to roll back missile defense initiatives in Europe, something the Russians wanted very much, but not until the 2012 election, the last chance for voters to hold Obama accountable, was over.

“On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this can be solved, but it’s important for him to give me space,” Obama told Medvedev, referring to Putin, who would be taking Medvedev’s place in two months. “This is my last election,” Obama continued. “After my election I have more flexibility.”

Unlike Trump’s meeting with Putin, which Tillerson witnessed, Obama’s conversation about his explicit willingness to bow to Russian interests wasn’t supposed to be heard by anyone at all. And yet a Times news story charitably described the exchange as “a private moment of candor.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: domesticenemies; media; msm; obama; putin; russia

1 posted on 01/15/2019 5:59:49 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Ted Kennedy tried to get the Soviets to hurt Reagan politically

Saw a Deep State shill on Tu Jed tonight talking domino theory for Europe to explain us paying billions to NATO. They were okay when Russia was communist. A few anti gay parades and they’re ready for WW 3.


2 posted on 01/15/2019 7:03:19 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The NY Times has always been very concerned about American patriotism and security. /s


3 posted on 01/15/2019 7:09:59 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Ted Kennedy’s treasonous letter.


4 posted on 01/15/2019 7:53:58 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

bump


5 posted on 01/15/2019 9:08:15 PM PST by Albion Wilde ("A wall, not because we hate the people outside of it, but because we love the people inside.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson