"Massachusetts Law Prohibiting Secret Recording of Public Officials Deemed Unconstitutional"
1 posted on
01/14/2019 12:11:49 PM PST by
WellyP
To: WellyP
Does this mean our domestic enemies can no longer call O’Keefe a “convict” whenever they use his name?
To: WellyP
Soon, they’ll make it illegal to criticize govt. if they’re not stopped.
3 posted on
01/14/2019 12:17:36 PM PST by
Bullish
(My tagline ran off with another man.)
To: WellyP
This story is over a month old. Just say’n
4 posted on
01/14/2019 12:18:06 PM PST by
Autonomous User
(During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
To: WellyP
5 posted on
01/14/2019 12:22:14 PM PST by
Mercat
To: WellyP
Glad you posted it—who would ever have known otherwise.
Also glad to learn it.
To: WellyP
The only purpose of laws against undercover recording is to protect lawmakers from having evidence collected against them.
8 posted on
01/14/2019 12:28:09 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Democracy dies when Democrats decide only elections they win are valid.)
To: All
I am amazed. A US Court which ruling according to USA law. One in a hundred win for those who fight the beast.
12 posted on
01/14/2019 12:49:12 PM PST by
veracious
(UN=OIC=Islam ; Dems may change USAgov completely, just amend USConstitution)
To: WellyP
13 posted on
01/14/2019 1:23:41 PM PST by
Notthereyet
(NotThereYet)
To: WellyP
Very useful is a school or college setting. The public needs to see how leftist teachers really operate and how the inmates are running the asylum.
14 posted on
01/14/2019 1:26:01 PM PST by
Socon-Econ
(adical Islam,)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson