I was responding to message #5 which mentioned people on FR saying that it was all a setup by her to kill her parents and run off with her 21-year-old ‘boyfriend’.
This jumped to #14 where that poster accused #5 of slandering FR readers by thinking they would say something like this.
I then posted that I had already seen FR posters speculating on just this fact on other threads.
From everything I’ve read, there is absolutely no cause for this speculation.
Don’t shoot the messenger.
I wasn’t shooting at you, but at those who thought she was in on the murder of her folks. My replies #49 and #50 were along those lines. Still more to come out on the story, but the killer was a very bad person.
Understood.
“This jumped to #14 where that poster accused #5 of slandering FR readers by thinking they would say something like this.”
Well, no, that’s not where the slander lay. Anybody might speculate and wonder about the circumstances before the facts come out. There’s nothing intrinsically wrong with that.
However, that’s not what was said about FR posters in #5. Go look. “Many of the posters” on FR were called “sick individuals” who were “desperately determined” to believe she was involved. “They don’t need evidence, that’s just the story they decided to believe early on.
Lot of them out there.”
Want to tell me how that’s *not* insulting to FR posters?
Can you direct me to a post wherein the poster was a sick individual who was desperately determined to believe she was involved, and who didn’t need evidence, but had just decided to believe that early on?
N.B., idle speculation doesn’t meet the terms. The poster must be “desperately determined” to believe the girl was involved.