I’m not a lawyer, but I don’t believe a private venture is capable of withstanding the multitude of lawsuits this project will generate.
[[I don’t believe a private venture is capable of withstanding the multitude of lawsuits this project will generate.]]
Depends on where it’s built I would assume- if the landowners happily sell their land, then the people who buy it can put a private wall up on that land I would imagine- there might be some land use regulations- and some red tape- but it won’t be nearly as bad as the government trying to take land from people that don’t want to sell
I’m not a lawyer, but I don’t believe a private venture is capable of withstanding the multitude of lawsuits this project will generate.
Why?
I think the plan is to built sections of the wall on the private land of owners who want the wall built there. Then all the illegals will be funneled through areas without the wall. Then the owners of the land who didn’t want a wall will suddenly want a wall on their property too.
So why any lawsuits?
“I don’t believe a private venture is capable of withstanding the multitude of lawsuits this project will generate.”
They also can’t waive the 28 laws that impose expensive and lenghty delays, as well as nuisance lawsuits from Leftist front groups, like DHS can.
The “attractive nuisance” doctrine compels the government to build the wall.