[rktman]

And the conclusion envelope please---------------- More and stricter gun laws will cause a decrease in these death rates. And if those don't reduce the rates, more and stricter gun laws will be imposed until there is a reduction in these rates. Liblogic 101 or in this case, calogic.

[rktman]

NON PRINT:

https://www.wnd.com/2018/12/foundation-uncovers-report-that-defies-anti-gun-agenda/

[chief lee runamok]

"A study done by officials at the University of California-Davis Violence Prevention Research Program and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health has uncovered the fact that the much-praised mandatory background checks in California – had no impact on gun deaths.

Maybe because criminals that intend murder or other violence do not bother with background checks?

[Spok]

Ineffective gun laws should be repealed. Gun ownership will ultimately be throttled by a thousand layers of red tape that will kill ownership by making compliance with all of them impossible. A defacto ban without calling it a ban.

[headstamp 2]

“Red Flag” laws will destroy gun ownership.

Even the GOP is buying into them.

[Blood of Tyrants]

The next round of laws will fix the problems caused by the previous law.

[pas]

You mean gang bangers were not deterred?

[ThunderSleeps]

Could it be that criminals don't obey "gun control" laws?

Could it be that strict "gun control" only serves to disarm law abiding citizens?

Could it be that when the general populace is disarmed, or far less likely to be armed - thanks to strict "gun control" laws - that violent criminals are actually more prevalent, more likely to commit crimes knowing they are less likely to run into an armed victim?