Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai
"Rules of engagement" and "foreign policy" are two different things.

How exactly would the U.S. conquer Afghanistan?

20 posted on 12/19/2018 3:25:53 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

In that case, the rules of engagement hamper the foreign policy, which has declared no place for terrorism IIRC and that would necessarily include utterly destroying the Taliban and finally dealing with the ideology that spawned it.

Also, Obama’s sobriquet “War of Necessity” comes to mind. Not to mention, after Bin Laden was dealt with, travesties such as trading five Taliban terrorists for Bowe Bergdahl among other travesties too many to list.

When the author in the OP cites someone who counts Don Black among his friends as someone we must listen to, that destroys his credibility as much as Bill Kristol destroyed his own with his overt liberalism.


40 posted on 12/19/2018 7:08:53 AM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson