But a different plaintiff and different event. They're going to gang up on this guy until the Supreme Court makes a definitive ruling on what's permissible and what isn't.
This isn't like a criminal case where each individual crime is tried as a separate offense.
This is a case of principle, which the court has already decided in the baker's favor. The underlying question of whether a person can be complelled to render services to another, for some purpose which violates their religious convictions, was settled.
Dragging the baker through another court case which is substantially the same as the first case, is a gross misuse of our justice system, and little more than waging 'lawfare' against the deep seated beliefs of the American people.