Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan to have first aircraft carriers since World War II
cnn ^ | 12/18/2018

Posted on 12/17/2018 10:59:27 PM PST by BenLurkin

In its 10-year Defense Program Guidelines, Tokyo said it will buy 42 of the stealthy F-35Bs, which are designed for short-run take offs and vertical landings.

Those planes will be available for deployment aboard two flat-top ships, the JS Izumo and JS Kaga, which at more than 800 feet long and displacing 27,000 tons are the largest ships in the Japanese fleet.

The Izumo and Kaga have been carrying helicopters designed for anti-submarine warfare since entering service over the past three years. They will need to have their decks reinforced to accommodate the heavier F-35Bs, as well as the heat and force from the jets' thrusters when they land vertically.

Japan will also increase its order for F-35A jets, which take off and land on conventional runways, to 105, the government said. Forty-two of those jets are in service or were part of earlier Japanese orders. Those planes will replace the Japan Air Self-Defense Force's aging F-15J fighters.

The purchases will be spread over 10 years, with 27 of the F-35As and 18 of the F-35Bs to be acquired, as well as the two warships to be refitted, in the first five years.

Total spending over the first five years is pegged at $282.4 billion and will include creating cyber defense and naval transportation units that operate across Japan's three military branches, the Ground, Air and Maritime Self-Defense Forces.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Japan
KEYWORDS: aircraftcarriers; f35; japan; jmsdf; navy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: BenLurkin
Only 77 years later.


21 posted on 12/18/2018 4:14:35 AM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

All of Asia is and will always be scared shitless of the Japanese.


22 posted on 12/18/2018 4:17:52 AM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker

They better upgrade their birthrate pronto, or maybe they’ll have robots manning these ships.


23 posted on 12/18/2018 4:43:40 AM PST by onona (It is often wise to allow a person a graceful path.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JustaTech

They did have the BAKA bomb.


24 posted on 12/18/2018 4:44:59 AM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Kaga and Izumo (also spelled Idzumo), which are named after Japanese provinces, might give American WWII veterans a sense of déjà vu.

The aircraft carrier Kaga took part in the attack on Pearl Harbor but was sunk half a year later at Midway.

In 1905, Izumo, a cruiser, took part in the Battle of Tsushima Strai in which the Japanese wiped out the Russian Baltic Fleet. In 1937, it was stationed in Shanghai when a Chinese bomber that was attacking it accidentally dropped its bomb on a nearby residential area killing nearly 1,000 people and making headlines around the world. In his memoir Way of a Fighter (New York: Putnam's, 1949) General Claire L. Chennault, who was advising the Chinese air force at the time, claimed that Izumo was sunk by a Chinese bomber shortly afterwards. However, it returned to Japan and served as a training ship before being sunk by US naval aircraft in July, 1945.

25 posted on 12/18/2018 6:22:13 AM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

They’ll get great gas mileage!........................


26 posted on 12/18/2018 6:30:59 AM PST by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Well, After Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Fukushima it’s no wonder!..............


27 posted on 12/18/2018 6:31:57 AM PST by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Kaga

Can the Soryu, Hiryu and Akagi be far behind?

28 posted on 12/18/2018 6:38:17 AM PST by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Here is the Kaga. Not very modern looking.... : )
ping
29 posted on 12/18/2018 8:25:16 AM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Look for the Japanese to go big on their next carrier, something approaching the Forrestal or Kitty Hawk class.


30 posted on 12/18/2018 1:30:38 PM PST by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
Another land lubber talking about "killing" a carrier. That term "kill" doesn't apply to naval warfare. One missile will not "kill" a carrier. To "kill" a carrier you have sink it. To sink a carrier requires under water hull damage. This requires a torpedo(s) or mines, not a missile(s). It takes two torpedo hits to sink an FFG weighing 5,000 tons. A carrier is 20 times that size so it would take 40 torpedoes to SINK a carrier.

The biggest threat to carriers are the lack of naval repair facilities and dry docks, not missiles. If a carrier limps back to port and there is no place to repair it then that is a soft kill. Thanks to Free Traitors™ our industrial base is not capable of sustaining a protracted naval war. Thanks Free Traitors™.

31 posted on 12/18/2018 1:46:14 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

Nice photo.


32 posted on 12/18/2018 1:46:40 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

Actually the latest Jap aircraft were every bit as good as ours but they came too late. KI-84 and N1K2 being the two best examples.


33 posted on 12/18/2018 1:50:07 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Nuclear carries are waste of money. Build two conventionals for one nuke.


34 posted on 12/18/2018 1:51:03 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: central_va

How about a 10 kT warhead half a mile away?


35 posted on 12/18/2018 1:59:09 PM PST by Jim Noble (Freedom is the freedom to say that 2+2 = 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
How about a 10 kT warhead half a mile away?

If Navy ships are shooting nukes at each other then the world is a cinder and what happens at sea is irrelevant.

36 posted on 12/18/2018 2:00:51 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: central_va

See, I don’t agree.

No American President is going to kill millions of civilians over an attack on a purely military target. Nuking carriers in port would be a no-no.

2000 miles at sea, with zero collateral damage? That’s different.


37 posted on 12/18/2018 2:09:20 PM PST by Jim Noble (Freedom is the freedom to say that 2+2 = 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Listen why would ships even have conventional weapons?


38 posted on 12/18/2018 2:10:34 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: central_va

The Jap Zero, unrivaled among carrier based fighters at the start of the war, weighed about as much as your SUV and produced 940 horsepower. If you can imagine driving an SUV with 940 hp, that’s what handling the Zero was like.


39 posted on 12/18/2018 2:41:28 PM PST by sparklite2 (See more at Sparklite Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

They zero had no sealing fuel tanks and no pilot armor. They sucked, really. I read Samurai! by Sakai and he had nothing but admiration for the toughness of USN planes even the lowly f4f wildcat.


40 posted on 12/18/2018 2:47:11 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson