Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

title:

Why Is The FBI Muzzling The Only Person With Credibility Left in The Flynn Investigation: FBI SSA Joe Pientka III

1 posted on 12/17/2018 8:31:53 PM PST by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


2 posted on 12/17/2018 8:32:12 PM PST by bitt (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Hmm. When I think FBI my mind is filled with images of them cordon ing off some airplane hangar in what is now major MS13 country middle island, Long Island to ‘investigate’ the TWA bombing for the Clintons. Everything from that point on is just smoke


3 posted on 12/17/2018 8:37:00 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

I dont understand how the FBI can overrule congress when it comes to letting this guy testify. Congress has oversight.


4 posted on 12/17/2018 8:43:50 PM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

The FBI has ZERO credibility.
They are no longer a force for good.
Especially with anything that can be damaging to democrat politicians.

And it goes back decades.

Read about the FBI massive cover up, hiding evidence and creating bogus reports of witness interviews in the 1996 shooting down of the TWA flight 800 Boeing 747 off Long Island.


7 posted on 12/17/2018 8:55:02 PM PST by Vlad The Inhaler (Yes Dorothy, Windows 10 sucks even in Kansas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Conning a person to NOT have an attorney present is the same as not reading them their miranda rights.


8 posted on 12/17/2018 8:55:45 PM PST by GOPJ (TERM LIMIT DC SWAMP BUREAUCRATS - a permanent un-elected ruling class is a threat to our freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

I guess it would be a lot more difficult to frame innocent people if the FBI had video, audio &/or independent stenographers during interviews rather than easily manipulated 302s handwritten by the agents conducting the interview.

Tha “premier” law enforcement agency doesn’t even use as sophisticated procedures as every police department in fly-over country.


9 posted on 12/17/2018 8:55:58 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Many years ago I had discussions with my brother, a far lefty from Berkley in California. He warned me about the “Deep State” and in effect I told him he was “Bat Sh-t” crazy. He was correct and I was wrong! He is still “Bat Sh-t” crazy in his political beliefs but 100% accurate on what the “Deep State” was and is.

Odd is it not that a far lefty and a far right person are on the same page today about the “Deep State?”

It is the greatest danger we have faced since the British in the war of Independence and our foes in WWI and WWII. The “Deep State” permeates all levels of government, as in the executive, the legislative and judicial with corruption motivated by power over all of us. It is evil.

Oddly the “Deep State” is not a centralized power lead by leaders. It is a system of corruption that protects its own power at many levels. It is a self serving entity. The greatest empire in history, The Roman Empire, also had its “Deep State” and thus came to a sad and predictable end.

Corruption will eat the heart out of any great nation or empire. It happened to the Soviet Union. It is happening to us. If not corrected we will fail.


12 posted on 12/17/2018 9:13:48 PM PST by cpdiii (Cane Cutter, Deckhand,Roughneck, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist: THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Re the CRUCIAL “workflow chart” issue. What needs to be asked is:

*When did agent Strzok and/or Pientka first write up the 302 report, when was it dated, and who was it given to in the “Chain of Command” for document processing?

* Where is the original 302 and any notes that it was based on? Again, a chain of command issuefrom Strzok/Pientka to the next step in the chain/custody procedure.

* There should be a “Log-In” book/list of when the document was given to the document processor and possibly a signed RECEIPT for it (and a copy, either physical or on a log-in computer records keeping system).

* There must be a Log-In book of when the document was entered into the system (and given a log-in number). Where is this book/database listing?

* What DOCUMENT NO. was given to the 302 (first by DOJ, and then possibly by another data-entry process)?

* Where (on what DOJ system) are 302’s kept? (It would be a classified system so it’s name wouldn’t be made public but it could be told to the Committees’ chairmen in camera).

I’ve had years of experience as a de factor records manager in terms of document intake, numbering, submitting it to systems manager for input into a large database, and just plain reading Opposing Counsel and Govt produced documents for various types of civil and criminal cases.

Generic Example based on reality. The Govt or Opposing Counsel/etc. finds/produces a document for a case. In the old days, it was given a physical Bates Stamp No. on a sticker, affixed to the document. Then the doc was Microfilmed or Microfiched with a REEL and IMAGE Number. Today it is directly scanned into a database but it is GIVEN a DATABASE NUMBER as well as a CASE NUMBER.

This way a document can be traced by a known case number (in the case documents log), the general databases’ assigned intake number (searchable by key-word-in-context (KWIC) titles or a similar system) and from the case attorney’s notes to the intake people/case status book they keep.

Somewhere that 302 and possibly other copies (if they were disseminated to other people for review, i.e., AG AAG, DAAG, case attorneys, etc.) is/are out there, like the Truth in the X-Files, only these are real.

Time to issue subpoenas to every one in the 302 Production/Chain of Custody family, and NOW.


13 posted on 12/17/2018 9:15:21 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

The most recent 302 provided is dated February 15th for the January 24th interview and signed by Strzok the liar.


21 posted on 12/18/2018 1:43:36 AM PST by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt
Apparently this was written before the original 302 was publicly released yesterday. You can read it here.
23 posted on 12/18/2018 3:47:24 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

The headline answered it’s own question.


24 posted on 12/18/2018 4:20:41 AM PST by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

If Judge Sullivan doesn’t throw out the case then we know he’s as corrupt as the rest of them,


26 posted on 12/18/2018 5:20:53 AM PST by captmar-vell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson