Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: carriage_hill

WHO is appealing it ?
Is Trump DOJ appealing it ?
Isn’t Trump over the DOJ ?

Why would Trump allow this ?


3 posted on 12/15/2018 5:02:12 AM PST by ncalburt (Gop DC Globalists out themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ncalburt

Trump wants Mitch and Nancy to pass a new great healthcare bill that protects existing conditions! What a buffoon.


9 posted on 12/15/2018 5:08:50 AM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ncalburt
WHO is appealing it ?

I was wondering the same thing. Who has standing to appeal?

10 posted on 12/15/2018 5:10:52 AM PST by Cowboy Bob ("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ncalburt; All
Why would Trump allow this ?

I do not think we know exactly the circumstances yet.

First it has to be appealed to the Fith Circuit. Who has standing to appeal is not clear. But lots of leftist activist groups will claim standing. Notice the DOJ did not attempt to defend this case.

From ksla.com: The Supreme Court upheld that part of the law in 2012, ruling it fell in line with Congress’ power to levy taxes.

Congress, however, eliminated the tax penalty last December as part of President Trump’s major tax overhaul.

A group of 20 states led by Texas sued to invalidate the law, arguing that, therefore, the mandate without a tax penalty attached was unconstitutional, and so too the rest of the law. The Justice Department had also announced in June it would not defend the ACA in the case, endorsing that argument.

“Once the heart of the ACA - the individual mandate - is declared unconstitutional, the remainder of the ACA must also fall,” the suit said.

Judge O’Connor, a George W. Bush appointee, agreed.

“The court … declares the Individual Mandate UNCONSTITUTIONAL,” his judgment concluded. “Further, the Court declares the remaining provisions of the ACA are INSEVERABLE and therefore INVALID.”
Who will appeal? Not sure. Someone will.

14 posted on 12/15/2018 5:16:27 AM PST by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ncalburt
WHO is appealing it ?

A mutual poster from an earlier thread tells US that California and 'other' States will appeal. How can anyone not a party in this suit appeal this ruling?

22 posted on 12/15/2018 5:39:39 AM PST by BlackbirdSST (Is it time Claire?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ncalburt

Per pmsNBC: “...a coalition of Republican-leaning states, led by Texas,...”


24 posted on 12/15/2018 6:04:06 AM PST by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ncalburt

That is my first thought. Who would have standing for an appeal?


33 posted on 12/15/2018 7:58:58 AM PST by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ncalburt

“Why would Trump allow this ?”

Once SCOTUS accepts the case, then you both argue it to be manifestly unconstitutional. Join the Texas judge in destroying it forever!

That would be why I think they would do this.


49 posted on 12/15/2018 8:31:07 PM PST by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson