Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Para-Ord.45

It has been ruled MANY times that the police have NO DUTY/ Obligation/ Liability or Responsibility to protect people.

And this needs to be brought up every single time in gun control debates.

The Police are NOT there to protect You.


11 posted on 12/13/2018 11:24:58 AM PST by uranium penguin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: uranium penguin

While I likely would have tried to sneak in and get a shot at the perp from cover, with clear and certain egress, I would not expect every sworn officer to be held to the standard of suicide.

If that is the standard my FR brethren want in LEO, they should endeavor to codify it in their state. And if successful, watch cops resign in droves.

Entry into that building would have a very, very high risk of being shot by a .223 round. Nearly certain. And nearly certain to not have affected the outcome.


22 posted on 12/13/2018 12:07:13 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: uranium penguin
It has been ruled MANY times that the police have NO DUTY/ OblAnd this needs to be brought up every single time in gun control debates. The Police are NOT there to protect You.igation/ Liability or Responsibility to protect people.
Based on these rulings can we file class actions against any PD that has this emblazoned on their patrol cars?

49 posted on 12/14/2018 12:17:47 PM PST by Impala64ssa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson