[[the data being fed into it. I believe that there are those who wish to produce an accurate model and get scientific results that can be scrutinized and seen as competent.]]
You have more faith than i in their intentions-
Awhile back, Satellite data showed there was no warming for nearly 20 years- the ‘science community’ was frantic trying to prove there was- yet the data didn’t support their claim- so what did they do? They claimed one of their satellites had ‘veered off course’ or was ‘out of position’ or some such nonsense, and they claimed the readings had to be thrown out, and new figures calculated based on what ‘they should have been, had the satellite ‘been in the right position’
And lo and behold, what do you suppose they found? Yup- global warming ‘had really occurred during that 20 year period’, and they had the ‘new figures to prove it’
I met quite a few climate scientists (PhD's) in post-grad school who truly were seeking an answer, whether man had any substantive influence on conditions due to pollutants or by-products. Their research was considerable but even they admitted there was no exhaustive source.