[Texas Fossil]

Why would he be fired for suggesting this?

[thoughtomator]

> Why would he be fired for suggesting this?

Because the last time we did that, it ended in a complete catastrophe, perhaps?

No-fly zones are acts of war. He is asking that we commit to a war. Americans have made clear in no small way that we do NOT want to commit to another war in Syria or anywhere else in the Middle East.

[DesertRhino]

He stated that the goal was regime change, and backing up the SDF head choppers. And his method of doing that is a no fly zone that could cause a shooting war with Russian jets.

Fire this idiot.

Mostly fire him for being stupid. He blurted out the REAL neocon military and intel agency agenda when the company line is “we are only fighting ISIS” (who we created with the Saudis to take down Assad)

[robowombat]

Unlike Iraq the Russians and their Syrian allies have pretty good anti-air systems. Whether they do or not however, this will lead to firing on USAF and USN aircraft and there then will be retaliatory US strikes. All this is to try and create the basis for another US ‘intervention’ . It is a scheme by the permanent government and the Neocons, who haven't had much traction since DJT came to Washington, to both get Trump entangled in another mindless Middle Eastern imbroglio to really anger his base and to stoke a new Cold War with Russia for many profitable reasons. So yes this guy should be fired immediately and the stupid sounding classic Foggy Bottom position he fills eliminated.