Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: taxcontrol
I know what you intended, but the thing is, there are no "federal" elections; ALL elections are state elections.

Some elections are for federal offices, but the states hold these elections on their own.

Constitutionally, the only federal "office" that had direct elections set up by the Framers were House elections. Elections for Electors to the Electoral College were transitory, as these were not for federal "officers" serving terms. The Senate did not have elections until 1913, but even these were state-by-state elections.

-PJ

19 posted on 12/04/2018 1:33:53 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

I understand that what you describe is the current situation. That is why I was proposing an alternate approach.


33 posted on 12/04/2018 2:19:18 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too; taxcontrol

I see your point about the election being a state function..

HOWEVER

I see no reason why a set of standards could be made law that a state election for a federal office must meet before the FedGov would recognize the election or the results of an election.


43 posted on 12/04/2018 4:28:30 PM PST by Neidermeyer (Show me a peaceful Muslim and I will show you a heretic to the Koran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson