Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut1

What the administration needs to impose on all parts of Obamacare that are still functioning is that thing that Obama first promised as he was preparing to enter office - transparency.

In all of the last 15 years until 2017 I was covered by a policy from my wife’s employer, a large national corporation with over 12k employees. She was provided with a health insurance package, and could ensure me for ~$300 additional per month. Then she turned 65 in mid 2017 and was covered by Medicare, and I had to go out onto Obamacare - and it was shocking. The first 6 months (the second half of 2017) covering myself only (age 60 at that time, healthy) with a Silver plan through Blue Cross Blue Shield of FL was $880/month. No subsidy due to our household income. In January 2018 the same policy was going to be $1440/month. I elected not to buy insurance and joined one of the “medi-share” type programs that were grandfathered in at the inception of Obamacare. Costs less than $300/month, and appears to have the same deductible profile as the BCBS plans that cost $1140 more each month.

When I am asked to pay $1440/month for something that is not tangible, I spend time analyzing it. The problem here is that the price is all you get - no breakdown of what goes into a premium that high.

The information that I expect to get in a quote would be a breakdown that would tell me what part of the $1440 is a payment to purchase my insurance and what part is a payment to subsidize other policies for other people.

Since the information i not available, I have to guess, and might guess that $500 is the premium to cover my insurance and $940 is a subsidy to buy down the cot of other’s premiums.

I could be way off the mark with that guess, but cannot be faulted because...the government, which must know the information in order to construct the program - doesn’t disclose the information to the public. They are not being in the slightest bit transparent.

Let’s say for the sake of argument that I am correct that the premium breaks down to $500 for my premium and $940 for the subsidy to others. If that was the case, and those numbers were disclosed to me, I could choose to accept it or object to it. And I would object to it and could make my representatives aware of how I felt.

I think that the primary accomplishment of Obamacare was in obscuring from the public the magnitude of the subsidies that are flowing from this group to that in this program.

Make it fully transparent, let every voter/taxpayer know what they are paying for and this will be dismantled in a hurry.


14 posted on 11/29/2018 9:15:43 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wally_Kalbacken

One of the best responses I’ve seen on this...


16 posted on 11/29/2018 9:28:02 PM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZGw2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Wally_Kalbacken
According to CDC, per person national health expenditures was $10,348 for 2016. Guess what? That is about the cost of a bare bones Bronze plan for a person around age 60 in my area. For someone age 64, the price of the Bronze plan is ~$12K per year. The deductibles are ~$7K before any insurance kicks in.
19 posted on 11/30/2018 3:33:09 AM PST by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

“Medi-Share”
Heads up,
Thanks!


23 posted on 11/30/2018 4:38:02 AM PST by Big Red Badger (Despised by the Despicable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson