Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Phillyred

well, gee, after 30 years of force-feeding people that having children would destroy the planet and they would live miserable little lives, it’s no surprise that the ‘college educated’ would buy into that.

In America we were asked to limit our children, so we could preserve our country and resources for our grandchildren who could go to smaller schools which would enhance learning. Our footprint on the world would be less, and that was a good thing, not only for the planet, but to preserve our natural and national treasures - those same resources and schools now being eaten up by illegals, who we are supposed to accept now because ‘we need people’.

But the question isn’t asked - what’s so wrong with a smaller population country? Why is it something that now needs to be fixed? Why is a population drop such an emergency? Because it isn’t. But guilt-trip articles meant to gain sympathy for forced migration do seem to be everywhere.


5 posted on 11/19/2018 7:59:46 PM PST by blueplum ( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: blueplum
what’s so wrong with a smaller population country? Why is it something that now needs to be fixed? Why is a population drop such an emergency?

Because low birth rates aren't compatible with the Western welfare model. When the birth rate is 2.0 (two children per woman), one married couple supports two grandparents. When the birth rate is 1.0, one married couple supports eight grandparents. When the birth rate is 0.5 (in some parts of Europe), one married couple must support 16 grandparents!
11 posted on 11/19/2018 9:05:58 PM PST by Right_Wing_Madman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson