Posted on 11/19/2018 1:46:56 PM PST by Kaslin
Do we think the journalists will play games like “I would like to grant my time back to Acosta to ask a question”
None of this “I’ve got a three-part question” either.
Acosta and CNN management ruined it for the rest of them.
Waste of time. This’ll just get challenged in court too.
Nip it in the bud. Ignore those absurd court stays on obvious executive authority.
I know the rest of the press pack think acosta is a royal rectal vent. They are circling the wagons in a suicide pact with him.
(5) if anyone breaks these rules, the press conference is over.
Pretty poorly drawn up rules if you ask me. They cover those who are “called upon” but do not address people just standing up and asking questions. Also says “may” have pass taken away rather than will have pass taken away. Watch, some lib judge will say that they didn’t make the rules specific enough so they can’t remove the pass because they didn’t violate the rules or the “may” leaves it open to interpretations. Just saying — that’s the way lib judges think and rule.
LOL!!! I LOVE number 3. :-)
Solution: Use two wireless microphones, with two assistants.
When the President points and says “Next” the audio person turns off the first mic, and the second assistant gives the second mic to the next reporter. Then the first mic is retrieved by the first assistant.
If they keep talking, the microphone gets reeled.
If they grasp onto the microphone, carry them (high above the gathered journalists) *******
Taking “Mic Drop!” To a whole new level! Love it!
Needed to happen.
Would be great if that happens and his name is the thing. You know, in 2024, when the press gets arrogant, they will say “Watch out for Brendan. He will acosta every time.”
Rule 5: at the earliest opportunity Jim Acosta will be dropped out of Air Force One, without a parachute.
Actually, the president or the press secretary should ask the reporter to defend what their outlet has said or written, then the reporter gets to ask a question.
Is there a rule against scrawling Jim Acosta is a b@#$ch on the walls of WH lavatories?
Acosta will be present to remind everyone why they don’t watch CNN.
“....or if a court should decide that explicit rules are required to regulate conduct there, we will be forced to reconsider this decision.”
I really like this comment.
It points to the questionability of the Judicial Branch involving itself in an Executive Branch matter.
More importantly, it underscores the irony of how the Courts’ involvement will only lead to further restrictions on the press, not freedom.
Sarah Sanders is a clever girl.
These rules won't last a week before a judge directs that they be withdrawn.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.