Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

I agree with you, but the courts will not. The ability of Congress to grant its permission for things wholesale by statute, instead of doing it on a case by case basis, is firmly “settled law,” as far as the US Federal courts are concerned. To overturn that precedent would disestablish the “administrative state” in its entirety. The Powers That Should Not Be know that. So it will not happen. Too bad, too sad.


33 posted on 11/13/2018 7:44:35 AM PST by sourcery (Non Aquiesco: "I do not consent" (Latin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: sourcery
The ability of Congress to grant its permission for things wholesale by statute, instead of doing it on a case by case basis, is firmly "settled law," as far as the US Federal courts are concerned.

There was a 7-2 decision in that case that suggests otherwise. Thomas' concurring opinion was the only one that directly addressed the constitutionality of the Vacancies Act, so it wasn't a critical element of the overall decision in the NLRB case.

34 posted on 11/13/2018 7:48:21 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson