Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ratcliffe, Gowdy join list of potential attorney general picks
NBC News ^ | By Leigh Ann Caldwell and Julia Ainsley | By Leigh Ann Caldwell and Julia Ainsley

Posted on 11/12/2018 11:00:23 AM PST by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last
To: Red Badger

A big hell NO to Gouty.


41 posted on 11/12/2018 11:31:25 AM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic is one stop shopping...It's the super Walmart for news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“I think Joe likes being independent.”

A few weeks back, someone mentioned the AG position to Joe DG on a Fox show, and I think he said he’d be open to it.

I know the Speaker Of The House doesn’t have to be a member of Congressman.
I know SCOTUS Justice doesn’t have to be an attorney.
Does the AG have to be an attorney?


42 posted on 11/12/2018 11:33:10 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (Nothing great was ever done in a Comfort Zone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

Must be licensed to practice law.


43 posted on 11/12/2018 11:34:29 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

No to Gowdy. Period.


44 posted on 11/12/2018 11:34:34 AM PST by tennmountainman ("Trust Sessions" Yeah Right")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Gowdy’s all hat and no cattle.


45 posted on 11/12/2018 11:35:33 AM PST by Bullish (My tagline ran off with another man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Usually when names are thrown around, they don’t get it. Remember when Trump was dining with Romney?

also, Christie is out as long as Kushner is in.


46 posted on 11/12/2018 11:37:29 AM PST by proust ("The rule is, jam tomorrow and jam yesterday, but never jam today.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ryderann

Gowdy could be a bad surprise. I would vote no.

Sessions looked like a champ until he recused himself.

Would Gowdy recuse himself? He is high on form.


47 posted on 11/12/2018 11:38:36 AM PST by Titus-Maximus (The trouble with socialism is that you soon run out of other people's zoo animals to eat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverevergiveup

Sydney Powell


48 posted on 11/12/2018 11:39:31 AM PST by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tallyhoe

“What is wrong with one that Trump picked?”

That’s what I keep asking - what’s wrong with Whitaker. He has 201 days & then can be renewed for another 210. If he can prove he can do the job during that time, why not keep him. Here is a very good thread about Whitaker:

Tracybeanz

@tracybeanz
Follow Follow @tracybeanz

1. There is a new Attorney General in town, and his name is Matthew Whitaker! We could speculate as to the many reasons why Sessions “resigned” etc, but that isn’t what this thread is going to be about. This thread is going to be about why this choice is no accident.

12:27 PM - 8 Nov 2018
https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1060629926901178368


49 posted on 11/12/2018 11:39:39 AM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Anyone but Gowdy. Kris Kobach or Radcliffe are my choices.


50 posted on 11/12/2018 11:40:33 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango; fieldmarshaldj

A big NO on Gowdy! He’s the same guy who pounded the table the loudest (with the most YouTube videos) and has the very least to show. All hat and no cattle.

Please name me one conviction he got for all his years of investigating and blustering? Just one.


51 posted on 11/12/2018 11:41:15 AM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam
You're dreaming of exceptions.

ALL Speakers of the House have been a member of the House.

ALL Justices of the Supreme Court were/are Attorneys.

ALL Attorney Generals have been and must be an Attorney.

52 posted on 11/12/2018 11:41:48 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

If the statute of limitations hasn’t already run out on Hillary’s crimes, Gowdy won’t after her. Joe De ,on the other hand would love to nail her.


53 posted on 11/12/2018 11:42:08 AM PST by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah
Those Oversight Committees have no power. They extract information and provide insight....and no more.

Gowdy is my first choice and I'm pretty sure he will be the President's pick.

54 posted on 11/12/2018 11:44:29 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

They’d have to build a few more doughnut stores in DC to accommodate Christie.


55 posted on 11/12/2018 11:44:33 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I think all of those choices stink. They would end up being another Sessions. They’re all, deep swamp things, and you can’t take the swamp out of the thing.

As much as I don’t like swamp things, of all of them, Rudy would be the only swamp thing I’d pick.

I’d go after Judge Jeanine before any swamp thing.


56 posted on 11/12/2018 11:48:54 AM PST by fightin kentuckian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Gowdy hates Trump. Remember when he chastised Trump about his tweets and said he should stop acting like he is guilty? Gowdy is a big defender of Mueller. God help us if someone convinces him to appoint Gowdy who screwed up the Benghazi investigation.


57 posted on 11/12/2018 11:51:07 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Whoever Trump appoints, it should definitely NOT be a politician or former politician. The position requires brains, cojones, and energy...attributes not home in most politicians.


58 posted on 11/12/2018 11:53:25 AM PST by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster

agree, loving Whitaker more and more.


59 posted on 11/12/2018 11:54:09 AM PST by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

but a justice of supreme court does not have to be lawyer - acc to the Internet


60 posted on 11/12/2018 11:54:30 AM PST by Karoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson