So they ruled on an unconstitutional act by a former resident of the white house.
More precisely, they told Trump that it was unconstitutional for him to reverse by EO a previous EO that in itself was unconstitutional at its time of issuance. But, not in those exact words.
7 posted on 11/08/2018 5:38:34 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
("It's always a party when you're eating the seed corn.")