Time will tell if this is true.
Nor did they care when Holder's actions led to the murder of two Border Patrol agents...and Obama shielded the DOJ documents by using executive privilege.
Rush will likely have a montage tomorrow of all the talking Heads using the term “loyalist”
The NYT’s has a piece tonight online also using that very term in it’s headline
Good!
Why does it require four people to write nonsense? Even if this is true, the compost has an ulterior motive in its publication. “Never let the truth get in the way of the agenda.”
Good.
It’s laughable that having a loyalist as AG is presented as unusual or bad.
Holder was an Obama loyalist. He even called himself Obama’s wingman.
JFK had his brother.
If true, good, it’s about time.
Did the press ever describe Obama appointees as loyalists?
I spent time with Matt at the University of Iowa. I hope is able to do what is right in the face of enormous pressure. I will be praying for him!
Trump did not pick Whitaker for his great legal mind, or for his vast experience in the highest levels of government. He picked him for his extreme loyalty. On this the stories are correct.
Matt has always been very decent to me. He’s a nice guy. I sincerely pray that he is not in over his head, and that the powers-that-be in DC don’t chew him up and spit him out.
By the way, there are some who are asking whether the pick of Whitaker is even legal. The claim is that it has to be someone previously approved by the Senate.
Whether this is correct or not, I do not know.
Checkmate. Now the Dems will accept anyone Trump nominates for AG, if just to save themselves from Whitaker.
I hope he keeps Whitaker for the rest of his term.
Janet Reno was the Clinton’s lap dog. Didn’t hear the Left complaining.
This commie rant is weird.
Hey WAPO, you lost.
Whitaker should be making sure that dossiers on Antifa members are started and filed. The FBI needs to find out who is paying them.
Malzberg | Matt Whitaker discusses the Clinton Campaign
Published on Jan 19, 2016
Founder, Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust, FactDC.org, Fmr. US Attorney (Iowa) joins Steve on possible new ethics violation involving Clinton Campaign and ethics issues with Billionaire Liberal donor Tom Steyer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6EBYF2n3OU&feature=youtu.be
And Obama didn’t have a couple toe-sucking loyalists?
If true, it is way past time. I find myself wondering what the truth is about Jeff Sessions. My first question would be, “Is he well?” My second question would be, “Is he loyal to the Deep State?” My third question would be, “What does the opposition have on him which could be used as blackmail?” These are just thoughts, not facts. I remember the prickly sensation that ran all over my body as the alarm rose in me that day when he accused himself from the Russian investigation soon after he was appointed DOJ. I felt very alarmed and wondered why he had been appointed. Did President Trump know he was going to do that? In retrospect, that whole Russian investigation feels like the Christine Blasy Ford charge against Judge Kavanaugh. I wonder whether some of the same people are involved in both.
Gee, Eric the Red Holder was no Obama loyalist was he. /sarc