Posted on 11/02/2018 4:10:29 PM PDT by Trump20162020
.
Like we didn’t already know this?
.
Women should forfeit the right to vote after this, at least for a probationary period,
Anyone who respects the heavy responsibility of the Judiciary Committee in vetting especially SCOTUS nominees, as Sen. Grassley does and as Sen. Feinstein does not, would pursue anyone who filed a false claim against this nominee or any other. Diverting the Committee’s resources is no small matter.
Anyone who respects the heavy responsibility of the Judiciary Committee in vetting especially SCOTUS nominees, as Sen. Grassley does and as Sen. Feinstein does not, would pursue anyone who filed a false claim against this nominee or any other. Diverting the Committee’s resources is no small matter.
Can’t open the PDF committee link.
Grassley needs to initiate a prosecution. Someone must pay for lying, suborning perjury, etc.
Attention and drama is for women, what sex is for men.
Sadly, after seeing how society has been collapsing since women got the right to vote, I am slowly getting to the point where I think only married women with/who have had children should have the right to vote. Those are the only women who have skin in the game. Otherwise, they vote largely about drama, special privileges, and perversion.
She further confessed to Committee investigators that (1) she “just wanted to get attention”; (2) “it was a tactic”; and (3) “that was just a ploy.” She told Committee investigators that she had called Congress multiple times during the Kavanaugh hearing process – including prior to the time Dr. Ford’s allegations surfaced – to oppose his nomination. Regarding the false sexual-assault allegation she made via her email to the Committee, she said: “I was angry, and I sent it out.” When asked by Committee investigators whether she had ever met Judge Kavanaugh, she said: “Oh Lord, no.”
In short, during the Committee’s time-sensitive investigation of allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, Ms. Munro-Leighton submitted a fabricated allegation, which diverted Committee resources. When questioned by Committee investigators she admitted it was false, a “ploy,” and a “tactic.” She was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation.
And it will never be on any major news outlet either.
The lowest, least likely accusers will be punished, like this one... the other’s, not so much. Too much work, takes the possible method off the table to be used again and will generate too much negative news.
It is all coordinated by the DC establishment and Uniparty leaders to make it look like they care... they do not.
They only care about the power and control.
Make her an example of lying under oath.
You rock, FRiend!
FOX, USA Today, and the British Daily Mail are all the major sites I could find that reported the story.
Wasn’t she also decades older than Judge K?
_______________
Excellent..............
ABC blows like CNN's Don Lemon does on his white boyfriend's weenie.
____________________
Whoever wrote this silliness knows President Trump wouldn't use her story as "an ugly chant" at a rally........... he knows that "you watched in horror as he vilified Dr. Blasey-Ford".
;-)
__________
By the way, where is a picture of this loser, Judy Munro-Leighton? I heard from a reliable source that this weird accuser is two decades OLDER than Kavanaugh.
Lord!
Yes I caught Jeff Kuhner’s show just as he was saying she was decades older. I guess no reporter got that scoop at the time.
My guess is that she did it for political reasons, not “for attention.”
But, now that she’s been referred by Grassley for prosecution, some lawyer has advised her that her best shot at minimizing legal hazard is to plead neurosis.
I AM SPARTACUS
I was raped by the Judge.
I was raped by the Judge.
I was raped by the Judge and his buddies!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.