Don’t worry darlings, soothed the SeeBSGrinch, everything will be alright....musn’t worry your pretty little heads, he hissed...
Not nearly low enough. Should be ZERO!....................
Right on time. Fake News. Predictably boring.
Yawn.
MAGA
PS
Isn’t the Pew Research Center (formerly the Pew Hispanic Center, but they ditched the controversial name) the same gang that’s been tellin’ us the “undocumented” population was only 11 million for, oh, 20 years now?
But now the Yale study says it’s 22 - 30 million, just like we all thought?
If they are undocumented, how do they know?
“The author of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 was Senator Lyman Trumbull.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1866
The Civil Rights Act of 1866
“Be it enacted...That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States”
....
http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-civil-rights-act-of-1866/
“Of course my opinion is not any better than that of any other member of the Senate; but it is very clear to me that there is nothing whatever in the suggestions of the Senator from Wisconsin. The provision is, that “ all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.” That means “subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.” Now, does the Senator from Wisconsin pretend to say that the Navajo Indians are subject to the Complete jurisdiction of the United States? What do we mean by “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States?” Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means. [emphases added] Can you sue a Navajo Indian in court? Are they in any sense subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States? By no means.”
— Senator Lyman Trumbull, Congressional Globe, 1774 - 1875 Congressional Globe, Senate, 39th Congress, 1st Session. (See middle of first column.)
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=073/llcg073.db&recNum=14
One certainly couldn’t tell by the births at the hospital where I work... unless the 1/3 - 1/2 or sometimes more of all the infants we register which are no ingles hispanics are legal residents or citizens. And we’re in the state capital of a very red state, not a rural or farm community or a sanctuary city (AFAIK)
I read this from Lucianne.com
Seems to me that ending birthright citizenship should be easy. The 14th amendment´s language includes: “ and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”...
All congress has to do is pass a law that defines “ and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” to mean that unless you´re a citizen or in the country legally, the jurisdiction clause doesn´t apply to you. Then explicitly state that at least one of the birth parents need to be in the country legally or citizenship isn´t conveyed.
30,000 illegal births during the Reagan years sounds great now
I thought they were Foreign National Invaders?
Does that mean we need more illegals?
Isn’t this a convenient “fact” just before the elections when border security and caravans are big in the news.