Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
Good question.

Back in 1984, I was helping to set up a pro-life problem pregnancy center. We ran across some information from the Guttmacher Institute, the abortion industry's scientific arm.

They ran a study in which they asked women if they would still get abortions if it were not legal.

The answers came back -

90% would not seek an abortion if it were illegal, which means they would go ahead and have the baby.

10% would still work to get an abortion.

This point of information should be made known to a wide audience. For some reason this study is not on the Guttmacher website.

So, yeah. Women should be held accountable to some extent. The real culprit though should be the hired gun, the doctor doing the deed.

5 posted on 11/01/2018 9:16:24 AM PDT by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Slyfox
So, yeah. Women should be held accountable to some extent. The real culprit though should be the hired gun, the doctor doing the deed.

But that's like saying that the person who makes an appointment with a hitman, drives the victim to the hitman, then pays the hitman, is less the "real culprit" in murder than the hitman and should only be "held accountable to some extent." If abortion is murder, then the woman who has an abortion should be guilty of murder and punished accordingly, up to and including the death penalty. It's the only logically consistent answer.

10 posted on 11/01/2018 10:48:41 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("The rat always knows when he's in with weasels."--Tom Waits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson