Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux
...as Charles Burton of Brock University told the National Interest, “there is no basis for give-and-take negotiation here.” His point? “While the U.S. has ample cause for dissatisfaction with China’s trade regime and pervasive use of economic espionage, China has no justified cause to make reciprocal demands on the U.S.” Burton is correct. This is, as he contends, “an asymmetrical dispute whose sustainable resolution can only come via unilateral concessions on the part of Beijing.” And Xi Jinping, due to his marching China back to a Maoist-Stalinist economy, is not going to make those concessions.

Would China throw in with Iran to keep oil flowing?

18 posted on 05/07/2019 9:54:06 AM PDT by GOPJ ("Elites reflexively exempt themselves from the ravages of their own policies." - nathanbedford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GOPJ

The new Silk Road route (belt and road initiate of China) runs right through Tehran. I think China has already thrown in with Iran.


19 posted on 05/07/2019 11:06:42 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson