Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage

The author should have made sure that wording was in the amendment...


8 posted on 10/31/2018 4:43:35 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: teeman8r

The author was not the only cook in the kitchen.


9 posted on 10/31/2018 4:47:50 AM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: teeman8r

There was no concern at the time. Amendments are not written to cover every imaginable concern. That is why SCOTUS reviews intent and meaning by inspecting the Congressional Record.


10 posted on 10/31/2018 4:47:51 AM PDT by Hostage (Article V (Proud Member of the Deranged Q Fringe))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: teeman8r

Let’s assume the drafters of that amendment were not morons. They had a choice between:

1. “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside,”

and

2. “All persons born or naturalized in the United States are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

They chose and ratified the second version. The only logical interpretation is that the phrase “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” was intended to have a restrictive meaning. President Trump is correct - the author did make sure that wording was in the Amendment.


15 posted on 10/31/2018 6:35:06 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson